Teams

STAP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-13vs NJ REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeather Ringelman / Melissa Doidge vs Martha Williams / Kaye Becker3-1
W#1 SinglesGabriela Parker vs Shellie Hall1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Conway / Tonya Laden vs Regina Bock / Jeanette Palizzi6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHeidi Halus / Jordan Campbell vs Anne Torkelson / Orit Ostrowiak4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-07-12vs BP REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Jaycox / Heidi Halus vs Deanna Espejo / Victoria Barstow3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGabriela Parker vs Andrea Philleo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Doidge / Tonya Laden vs Denise Hernandez / Irene Arguelles6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHeather Ringelman / Jordan Campbell vs Lisa Tran / Rosemary Garcia6-0, 6-0
2021-07-06vs MC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesCourtney Krusemark / Amanda Iapalucci vs Pamela Bokusky / Denise Belk6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGabriela Parker vs Cyndy Besselievre6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKC Nettleton / Heidi Halus vs Martha Peck / Robin Behrstock4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTonya Laden / Melissa Doidge vs Karen Greenwood / Shelley Flood6-3, 6-0
2021-06-23vs CP GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesJordan Campbell / Anne Quallick vs Rachel Heise / Catherine Safieddine3-3
L#1 SinglesGabriela Parker vs Juliana Okulski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Krusemark / Susan Conway vs Stephanie Greco / Jennifer Mele6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKC Nettleton / Heidi Halus vs Shannon McKay / Irina Suyumova4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-16vs NJ GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmanda Iapalucci / Courtney Krusemark vs Tina Francis / Michelle Phenicie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeidi Halus vs Elisa Dannemiller6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Conway / Tonya Laden vs Charlene Bailey / Susan Beaudoin1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKC Nettleton / Melissa Doidge vs Karen Payne / Kim Grogan0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-08vs CP TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesJordan Campbell / Anne Quallick vs Kristen Tourangeau / Susan Marshall2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney Krusemark vs Gloria Gonzalez6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKC Nettleton / Adrienne Jaycox vs Pam Turner / Audrey Davine5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Ringelman / Heidi Halus vs Michelle Sachs / Susan Hoelscher4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
KC Nettleton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Anne Quallick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Amanda Iapalucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Jordan Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Courtney Krusemark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Tonya Laden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Gabriela Parker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Adrienne Jaycox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Heidi Halus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
Heather Ringelman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cam Pagel
published
Melissa Doidge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Conway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Campbell + Anne Quallick281657% games+0.8% vs expected
KC Nettleton + Melissa Doidge9751% games−0.4% vs expected
Melissa Doidge + Tonya Laden3255% games−0.5% vs expected
Tonya Laden + Susan Conway4546% games−2.1% vs expected
KC Nettleton + Jordan Campbell3252% games−3.9% vs expected
KC Nettleton + Heather Ringelman044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Nettleton
66W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
Anne Quallick
55W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Amanda Iapalucci
63W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
Jordan Campbell
59W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Courtney Krusemark
83W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Tonya Laden
91W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Gabriela Parker
19W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Adrienne Jaycox
72W–65L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Heidi Halus
61W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Heather Ringelman
9W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Cam Pagel
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Melissa Doidge
36W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Conway
26W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.