Teams

40+ Mixed 6.0 Acc. Team

2026 Mixed 40 & OVER Summer · 6.0 MIXED S26

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-27vs NarvaezLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Gaynor / Richard Naistat vs Meredith Stromberg / Michael Trangle3-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Matthews / Peggy Orgeman vs Toby Madden / Molly Northrup6-7
L#3 DoublesTad Dolphay / Georgia Ulmer vs Mary Routhieaux / Richard Iverson5-7
2026-07-23vs NarvaezWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy Orgeman / Raymond Matthews vs James McCann / Kay Leflay6-4
L#2 DoublesKate Gaynor / Richard Naistat vs Jack Nelson / Mary Routhieaux2-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Gardner / Michele Franchett vs Eric Narvaez / Bettina Wernimont6-3
2026-07-21vs NarvaezLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Franchett / Keith Gardner vs Richard Iverson / Mary Frances Price7-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Cram / Kate Gaynor vs Toby Madden / Molly Northrup3-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Orgeman / Tad Dolphay vs Michael Trangle / Bettina Wernimont5-7
2026-07-14vs NarvaezLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeith Gardner / Michele Franchett vs Robert Burley / Tram Struve4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ericson / Raymond Matthews vs Jack Nelson / Mary Frances Price3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Gaynor / Kenneth Cram vs Toby Madden / Molly Northrup3-6
2026-07-07vs NarvaezLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Gaynor / Raymond Matthews vs Richard Iverson / Bettina Wernimont3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ericson / Kenneth Cram vs Michael Trangle / Mary Frances Price3-6
W#3 DoublesPeggy Orgeman / Richard Naistat vs Jack Nelson / Kay Leflay6-2
2026-07-01vs NarvaezLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ericson / Raymond Matthews vs Richard Iverson / Mary Routhieaux2-6
L#2 DoublesKate Gaynor / Kenneth Cram vs Michael Trangle / Meredith Stromberg2-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Franchett / Richard Naistat vs Tram Struve / Toby Madden7-6
2026-06-24vs NarvaezWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Ulmer / Richard Naistat vs James McCann / Kay Leflay6-3
L#2 DoublesKenneth Cram / Jennifer Ericson vs Robert Burley / Tram Struve3-6
W#3 DoublesPeggy Orgeman / Keith Gardner vs Mary Frances Price / Eric Narvaez6-4
2026-06-17vs NarvaezLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Franchett / Tad Dolphay vs Eric Narvaez / Meredith Stromberg6-3
L#2 DoublesKeith Gardner / Georgia Ulmer vs Robert Burley / Tram Struve5-7
L#3 DoublesKenneth Cram / Jennifer Ericson vs James McCann / Kay Leflay3-6
2026-06-12vs NarvaezLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeggy Orgeman / Tad Dolphay vs Tram Struve / Robert Burley4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Franchett / Raymond Matthews vs Bettina Wernimont / Eric Narvaez5-7
W#3 DoublesRichard Naistat / Georgia Ulmer vs James McCann / Kay Leflay6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.0 MIXED S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140+ Mixed 6.0 Acc. Team2791818147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Keith Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Eric Narvaez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Michele Franchett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Georgia Ulmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Jennifer Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kate Gaynor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kenneth Cram
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Peggy Orgeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Raymond Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Naistat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tad Dolphay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Cram + Jennifer Ericson033 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Cram + Kate Gaynor033 matchesnot enough data
Michele Franchett + Keith Gardner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Gardner
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
3
Eric Narvaez
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Michele Franchett
18W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Georgia Ulmer
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Jennifer Ericson
6W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kate Gaynor
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenneth Cram
2W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Orgeman
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raymond Matthews
5W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Naistat
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tad Dolphay
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.