Teams

Webber Magnolia

2026 Adult 55 & Over-EC · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-11vs Tompkins 55+ 3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine van Asselt / Kathryn Kenne vs Terri Amacker / Kathy Beasley6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Bearden / Debbie Monroe vs Maggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Falkner / Renee Gibbons vs Lynn Gibson / Catherine Policicchio3-6, 1-6
2026-03-27vs Tompkins 55+ 3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesRenee Gibbons / Debbie Monroe vs Maggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Kenne / Cyndi Sullivan vs Laura Hodges / Robbin Jones6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Falkner / Maria Bearden vs Lynn Moorehead / Karen Turner6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-21vs Tompkins 55+ 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesVivian Cade / Cyndi Sullivan vs Kathy Beasley / Catherine Policicchio6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeslie Webber / Missy Brown vs Lynn Gibson / Laura Hodges6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Falkner / Debbie Monroe vs Maggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly2-6, 1-6
2026-03-12vs Tompkins 55+ 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesVivian Cade / Kathryn Kenne vs Maggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMissy Brown / Ann Swedenburg vs Terri Amacker / Catherine Policicchio6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Falkner / Renee Gibbons vs Lynn Moorehead / Karen Turner6-2, 6-2
2026-03-05vs Tompkins 55+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Bearden / Catherine van Asselt vs Maggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Swedenburg / Leslie Webber vs Terri Amacker / Lynn Gibson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Webber Magnolia328717121
2Tompkins 55+ 3.5237817123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Swedenburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine van Asselt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kathryn Kenne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Jennifer Falkner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Renee Gibbons
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Maria Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Debbie Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Leslie Webber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Missy Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vivian Cade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Brown + Leslie Webber11558% games+3.3% vs expected
Jennifer Falkner + Renee Gibbons3251% games−3.5% vs expected
Maria Bearden + Ann Swedenburg2440% games−14.5% vs expected
Maria Bearden + Catherine van Asselt3255% gamesnot enough data
Renee Gibbons + Ann Swedenburg314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Swedenburg
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Catherine van Asselt
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathryn Kenne
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Falkner
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Renee Gibbons
27W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Maria Bearden
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Debbie Monroe
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.85
Leslie Webber
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Missy Brown
30W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vivian Cade
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.