Teams

Lifetime Plano/Fenter M4.5

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-25vs Oak Creek/Knust-Clouston M4.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesPablo Eguez vs Andrew Knust6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBurak Berksoy / Daniel Keller vs Brian Swanberg / Vivek Jadhav6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJordan Gilbreath / Joseph Kan vs Marcos Garcia / Dan Cordales2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-11vs Canyon Creek/Robbins M4.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTaylor Rogers / Daniel Keller vs Daniel Robbins / Lynn Khaing6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Seay/Orsak-Byrd M4.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesPablo Eguez vs Ariel Blask7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBurak Berksoy / Daniel Keller vs Derek Pope / Derek Hall6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTaylor Rogers / Jonathan Cobb vs Michael Byrd / Paul Orsak3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-27vs Oak Creek/Chopra-Patel M4.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesJinting Chen vs Vignan Thumu6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJonathan Cobb / Taylor Rogers vs Samuel Hussein / Brett Bormann6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRusty Hood / Gil Bermudez vs Trenton Lewis / Dennis van Ham2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-21vs Chandlers Landing/Frajkor M4.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesTaylor Rogers / Daniel Keller vs Leslie Stark / Adam Morris7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmine Kamali / Thadius Beavers vs Judd Esch / Andres Rodriguez6-1, 6-3
2025-09-07vs North Texas RC/Odulio M4.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesMike Burch / Joseph Kan vs Christopher Nguyen / Mark Nguyen1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJinting Chen vs Stefan Hernandez6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGil Bermudez / Jordan Gilbreath vs Dylan Patel / Gerard Odulio6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime Plano/Jett-Pokorny M4.5702629189
2Seay/Orsak-Byrd M4.55117719197
3Kiest/Lee M4.55219921196
4Greenhill/Ohl M4.552171125214
5Brookhaven/Phelan-Hashimoto M4.552161227236
6Lifetime Plano/Fenter M4.54112821161
7Oak Creek/Knust-Clouston M4.53315924195
8Chandlers Landing/Frajkor M4.533111326220
9Oak Creek/Chopra-Patel M4.533111328237
10JCC/Schachter-Boraks M4.534151331244
11Fretz/Conwill-Sundaresan M4.525121636264
12Canyon Creek/Robbins M4.51461428197
13North Texas RC/Odulio M4.51581634243
14Lifetime Frisco/McDonald M4.51642451323
15Oak Creek/Cai-Chen M4.50732550306

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Burak Berksoy
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.29
Daniel Keller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Amine Kamali
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Thadius Beavers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Joseph Kan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gil Bermudez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jinting Chen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jonathan Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jordan Gilbreath
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Burch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pablo Eguez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rusty Hood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Fenter
published
Tedmund Chua
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Keller + Jonathan Cobb123 matchesnot enough data
Gil Bermudez + Jordan Gilbreath213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Kan + Jonathan Cobb123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Burak Berksoy
24W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
Daniel Keller
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Amine Kamali
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Thadius Beavers
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Joseph Kan
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.87
Gil Bermudez
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jinting Chen
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Cobb
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jordan Gilbreath
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Burch
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Pablo Eguez
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rusty Hood
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sean Fenter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tedmund Chua
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.