Teams

Kraft - Rudolph

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Men · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.39 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesColin Smith / Dale Bennett vs Billy Burgess / Bryan Kelley4-6, 3-6
2025-03-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDennis Lamoureux / Dale Bennett vs Billy Burgess / Bryan Kelley3-6, 5-7
2025-02-23vs Duval/Andrews/55&Over9.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesColin Smith / Alan Hopkins vs Martin Luytjes / William Morgan6-0, 6-3
2025-02-09vs Duval/Andrews/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesColin Smith / Richard Rudolph vs Martin Luytjes / Jeff Leinan6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-26vs Duval/Andrews/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesDennis Lamoureux / Dale Bennett vs Kevin Grant / Patrick Emmet2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Colin Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.47
Allen Webb
published 4.5
Chris King
published 4.5
James Turnbull
published 4.5
4.21
David Jenkins
published 4.5
4.13
Dennis Lamoureux
published 4.5
4.09
Mark Freyman
published
3.97
Alan Hopkins
published 4
3.92
Dale Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Scott Suhrer
published
3.89
Gerald Henline
published 4
Edward Spiezio
published
Richard Rudolph
published
Wilson Tennille
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Suhrer + Dennis Lamoureux224 matchesnot enough data
Dale Bennett + Gerald Henline224 matchesnot enough data
Gerald Henline + Mark Freyman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Colin Smith
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Allen Webb
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
4.47
4.5
Chris King
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
James Turnbull
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Jenkins
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Dennis Lamoureux
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
Mark Freyman
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Alan Hopkins
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Dale Bennett
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Scott Suhrer
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.90
4
Gerald Henline
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Edward Spiezio
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Rudolph
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wilson Tennille
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.