Teams

KY/LEX/McGuire

2024 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEXINGTON OFFICIAL · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-23vs KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSSLost 03
L#1 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / Zachary Botts vs Adam Bantz / Tyler Pewitt3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Cordray / Vijay Saki vs Jose Guijosa / Zach Young4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Workman / Jake Caverly vs Guston Thomas / Jay Swacker1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-23vs KY/LEX/Wilson/LexingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMorgan Cordray / Ronald Eckstein vs Bradley Lewis / Lee Robinson4-6
L#2 DoublesVijay Saki / Kyle Smith vs Gary Spratt / Dave Messner2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Workman / Jake Caverly vs Ross Stone Babbit / Rex McClanahan0-6, 2-6
2024-03-22vs KY/LEX/ShetlerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRonald Eckstein / Gheorghe Ignat vs Brandon Shetler / Santiago Bravo6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKyle Smith / Vijay Saki vs Johan Graham / Jordan Yeiser0-6, 2-6
2024-03-22vs KY/LEX/KennoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Swan / Carlyn Moore vs Carmen Ignat / Laura Kennoy6-3, 7-5
2024-03-21vs KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSSLost 02
L#1 DoublesGheorghe Ignat / Ronald Eckstein vs Adam Bantz / Ian Walton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Cordray / Vijay Saki vs Joe Ross / Matthew Riddell0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSS50141579
2KY/LEX/Wilson/Lexington329614130
3KY/LEX/Shetler133918119
4KY/LEX/McGuire0411122139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Gheorghe Ignat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Workman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jake Caverly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Morgan Cordray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ronald Eckstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Swan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vijay Saki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Zachary Botts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gheorghe Ignat
212W–125L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3
David Workman
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jake Caverly
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Morgan Cordray
9W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronald Eckstein
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Swan
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Vijay Saki
2W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zachary Botts
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.