Teams

ACAC Koch

2025 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-29vs Willow Oaks MullinaxWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Carman / Jay Alcorta vs Agustin Rodriguez / Terence Blackwood1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGregory Ewald / Brian Premock vs Jeffrey Begin / Thomas Burke6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlan Singer / John Johnston vs Brian Ford / Charles Christianson3-6, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Westwood Lemco/WestWon 30
W#1 DoublesJay Alcorta / Craig Carman vs Harry Turton / Robert Nilson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGregory Ewald / Jeffrey Raihall vs Scott Dillard / Vincent Wood6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Jones / Randy Koch vs Juan A Astruc Jr. / Robert Paullin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Gary Reinhardt
published 4
3.43
Jeffrey Raihall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Alan Singer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Jay Alcorta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Jonathan Meade
published
3.27
Craig Carman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Gregory Ewald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Brian Premock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Eric Carter
published 3.5
Randy Koch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Alcorta + Craig Carman224 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Ewald + Brian Premock224 matchesnot enough data
Randy Koch + Jeffrey Raihall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gary Reinhardt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jeffrey Raihall
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Alan Singer
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
Jay Alcorta
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Jonathan Meade
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Craig Carman
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gregory Ewald
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Brian Premock
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Eric Carter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.94
Randy Koch
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.