Teams

TAG SILVER

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-21vs HMTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan Johnson / Nik Bjelland-Miller vs Dwight Muhlbradt / Kent Mueller7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDon Walker / Robert Herrera vs Nicola Demacopoulos / Dennis Knopf6-3, 6-1
2021-07-07vs CSUWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Diaz / Nik Bjelland-Miller vs Eric Sutherland / James Rose7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDon Walker / Steve Niccolai vs Rick Mohr / Gordon Motley6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-30vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesDon Walker / Dan Erbacher vs Dennis Flanigan / Mark Flanigan3-6, 6-7
2021-06-23vs LVTA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesNik Bjelland-Miller / Dan Johnson vs Alan Krech / Greg Jette6-1, 6-0
2021-06-16vs LTLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicholas Hamlin / Nik Bjelland-Miller vs Jim Kelly / Jesse Fleming3-6, 3-6
2021-06-09vs FCCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Hamlin / Nik Bjelland-Miller vs Mark Orr / Leon Green7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nik Bjelland-Miller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Bobby Diaz
published 4
3.71
Robert Herrera
published
3.57
Robin Wick
published
3.38
Don Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ben Struzenberg
published
Dan Erbacher
published
Douglas Keever
published
Mark Oates
published
Steve Niccolai
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Wick + Steve Niccolai4254% games+0.4% vs expected
Don Walker + Ben Struzenberg5258% gamesnot enough data
Steve Niccolai + Ben Struzenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Bobby Diaz + Nik Bjelland-Miller303 matchesnot enough data
Robin Wick + Douglas Keever213 matchesnot enough data
Don Walker + Steve Niccolai123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nik Bjelland-Miller
20W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bobby Diaz
29W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Herrera
49W–32L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Robin Wick
29W–32L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Don Walker
44W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.38
Ben Struzenberg
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Dan Erbacher
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Douglas Keever
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Oates
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Niccolai
14W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.