Teams

Dodson Day

2025 South East Tennis Combo 65 & over · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-14vs Lemmons/Bachman DayWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Catalano / Janet Harbeck vs Donna Garner / Anne Ryals7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTami Hahn / Cindy Leighton vs Georgina Dillon / Linda Young6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Lundy / Mary Jane Johnson vs Paula Bachman / Ginger Wessell6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-10vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Foscue / Cynthia Lundy vs Susan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Dodson / Susan Williams vs Karen Holden / Sylvia Jones3-6, 1-6
2025-10-07vs Lemmons/Bachman DayWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Jane Johnson / Cindy Leighton vs Sylvia Jones / Karen Holden6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Harbeck / Susan Catalano vs Linda Young / Joyce Jordan6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTami Hahn / Cynthia Lundy vs Paula Bachman / Sharon Sypniewski6-3, 7-5
2025-10-02vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Catalano / Janet Harbeck vs Ginger Wessell / Paula Bachman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Nolan / Lynn Caputo vs Karen Holden / Sylvia Jones2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Tryer / Cynthia Lundy vs Donna Garner / Georgina Dillon2-6, 5-7
2025-09-25vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Catalano / Janet Harbeck vs Susan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Nolan / Mary Jane Johnson vs Donna Garner / Karen Holden6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Pope / Tami Hahn vs Anne Ryals / Ginger Wessell2-6, 3-6
2025-09-19vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynn Caputo / Barbara Nolan vs Dianne McKenna / Sylvia Jones6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Breyfogle / Tami Hahn vs Donna Garner / Karen Holden1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Pope / Cynthia Lundy vs Georgina Dillon / Linda Young2-6, 0-6
2025-09-11vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Leighton / Karen Foscue vs Susan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Lundy / Christine Tryer vs Paula Bachman / Ginger Wessell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Dodson / Patricia Breyfogle vs Robyn Mann / Joan Cozza2-6, 0-6
2025-09-05vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Harbeck / Cindy Leighton vs Robyn Mann / Linda Young1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Caputo / Barbara Nolan vs Dianne McKenna / Sylvia Jones2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTami Hahn / Patricia Breyfogle vs Anne Ryals / Sharon Sypniewski2-6, 6-7
2025-09-02vs Lemmons/Bachman DayLost 12
L#1 DoublesTami Hahn / Cindy Leighton vs Susan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Johnson / Cynthia Lundy vs Paula Bachman / Linda Young4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Catalano / Janet Harbeck vs Robyn Mann / Sharon Sypniewski6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Mary Jane Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Janet Harbeck
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Christine Tryer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Susan Catalano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Tami Hahn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Linda Dodson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Barbara Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Cindy Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Cynthia Lundy
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Karen Foscue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Caputo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Martha Pope
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Breyfogle
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Catalano + Janet Harbeck3348% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Caputo + Barbara Nolan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Johnson
11W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Janet Harbeck
9W–18L career · 10 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Christine Tryer
13W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Susan Catalano
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Tami Hahn
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Linda Dodson
0W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Barbara Nolan
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Leighton
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cynthia Lundy
2W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Foscue
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Caputo
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Pope
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Breyfogle
0W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.