Teams

MC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-31vs RHCC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesEthan Carlson / Eric Hemmer vs John Holbrook / Paul Grumann6-0, 6-1
2022-05-17vs LTC SILVERLost 13
L#1 DoublesTrevor Trumble / Brad Arnold vs Scot Schneider / Rusty Redinger7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClaude Murray vs Greg Tilden1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Vermeulen / Brian Fletcher vs Farhad Noorbakhsh / Timothy Kuebler7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Hemmer / Ethan Carlson vs Chet Paris / Kiet Killion6-1, 6-3
2022-05-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Vermeulen / Eric Hemmer vs Michael Campbell / Greg Olson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-26vs LTC REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Hemmer / Dan Parker vs Randy Holstlaw / Steve Caulk3-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs RRTC NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Parker / Eric Hemmer vs Joe Martinez / David Lane1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Brad Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Eric Hemmer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Michael Dill
published
3.04
Claude Murray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Brian Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dan Parker
published 3
Ethan Carlson
published
Jerry Mogab
published
Thomas Toomey
published
Trevor Trumble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Fletcher + Claude Murray2338% gamesnot enough data
Trevor Trumble + Brian Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Trevor Trumble + Brad Arnold123 matchesnot enough data
Trevor Trumble + Claude Murray123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Fletcher + Michael Dill033 matchesnot enough data
Brian Fletcher + Brad Arnold033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brad Arnold
29W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Eric Hemmer
42W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Michael Dill
7W–20L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Claude Murray
18W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Brian Fletcher
20W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.90
3
Dan Parker
12W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ethan Carlson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jerry Mogab
3W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Toomey
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trevor Trumble
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.