← Teams

VTC-Hunter

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.57 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Carrie Willis
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.52
Katrina Phillips
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lynne Nieda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Porter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Kyra John
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.71
Amy Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results7 ties
2021-07-31Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLynne Nieda / Kyra John vs Erin Hill / Jennie Brawn7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDayna Porter / Jennifer Bane vs Michele Snyder / Paula Jacobson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTina Clancy / Karen Pickering vs Jennifer Lucas / Julie Trujillo6-1, 6-4
2021-05-08Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesNatalya Ramras / Karen Pickering vs Lana Lane / Suzie Glenn7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Leslie Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynne Nieda / Molly Wilson vs Karen Ford / Nozomi Bray6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Olsen / Katrina Phillips vs Chikako Hokanson / Gretchen Newcomb6-3, 6-0
2021-05-02Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesNatalya Ramras / Lynne Nieda vs Megan Daniels / Kathryn Eddy6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Cassia Carpio7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Hicks / Molly Wilson vs Shamera Daugherty / Elizabeth Domagalski6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDayna Porter vs Patricia Board6-2, 6-0
2021-04-25Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesDayna Porter / Karen Pickering vs Clarice Brown / Tammy Cofield6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynne Nieda / Natalya Ramras vs Julie Kim / Diane Malhotra6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Jeri Finn6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMolly Wilson / Amy Hicks vs Yoko Moore / Rachel Young7-6, 6-0
2021-04-17Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesLynne Nieda / Kyra John vs Brooke Daniel / Amy Cooney6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatrina Phillips vs Christian Buchholz6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDanielle Barrett / Karen Pickering vs Shelly Bigley / Kristen LaBarca6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNatalya Ramras / Dayna Porter vs Patries Ferguson / Jacquelyn Miller6-1, 6-2
2021-04-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKyra John / Lynne Nieda vs Amy Cooney / Brooke Daniel6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNatalya Ramras / Karen Pickering vs Shelly Bigley / Gretchen Sturm6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCarrie Willis vs America Hopson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-21Lost 0–5
L#1 DoublesDanielle Barrett / Karen Pickering vs Hong Huynh / Kayleen Mendenhall6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Elizabeth Cook3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyra John / Dayna Porter vs Loo Yah Leong / Kate Leatherbarrow7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatrina Phillips vs Kathy Cook1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Hicks / Rachel Olsen vs Tina Prassas / Laurence Dupray6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Willis
121W–52L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Katrina Phillips
35W–40L career · type A
30%70%0%
3.52
3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
3.5
Lynne Nieda
62W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Kyra John
42W–40L career
3%96%0%
3.19
3
Amy Hicks
57W–67L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.