Teams

Xu

2021 18&Over Men · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-07-21vs KellyLost 12
L#1 DoublesIan Gregory-Davis / Jeff Wagstaff vs Patrick Kelly / Jordan O'Connell6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesManuel Castillo vs John Miller6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Bupp / Mark Pastorella vs Adam Khalil / Luke Petrosino6-2, 7-6
2021-07-17vs BundickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephen Repass / Manuel Castillo vs Matthew Mason / James Green2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIan Gregory-Davis / Mark Pastorella vs Cliff Bundick / Gavrail Tatarliev6-2, 6-1
2021-07-11vs Western: Roch: Cameron/StutzmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Repass / Jeff Wagstaff vs Khai Du / Norman Yung2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesManuel Castillo vs Nam Danh6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesScott Hammerton / Brian McQuillan vs Chris Mariano / Ethan Borg3-6, 4-6
2021-06-23vs KellyLost 02
L#1 DoublesManuel Castillo / Scott Hammerton vs John Miller / Daniel Seaberg1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGregg Hartvigsen / Xunyi Xu vs Patrick Kelly / Darren Stohr2-6, 4-6
2021-06-19vs BundickWon 21
W#1 DoublesIan Gregory-Davis / Tane Robinson vs Cliff Bundick / Gavrail Tatarliev6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesManuel Castillo vs Nathan Rohman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStephen Repass / Scott Hammerton vs James Green / Amir Aslam6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-09vs Western: Roch: Cameron/StutzmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Wagstaff / Ian Gregory-Davis vs Seth Sealfon / Chris Mariano1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesManuel Castillo vs Nam Danh6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Repass / Scott Hammerton vs Will Yeoh / Aaron Huber6-4, 6-2
2021-05-30vs KellyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Manuel Castillo vs Patrick Kelly / Darren Stohr6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMark Pastorella vs John Miller3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesXunyi Xu / Scott Hammerton vs Adam Khalil / JIM MCDERMOTT1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-23vs BundickLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Jeff Wagstaff vs Nathan Rohman / Neil Weaver6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGregg Hartvigsen vs Amir Aslam5-7, 3-4
L#2 DoublesBrian McQuillan / Tane Robinson vs Cliff Bundick / James Green2-6, 4-6
2021-05-16vs Western: Roch: Cameron/StutzmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Stephen Repass vs Norman Yung / Nithin Seshadri6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesManuel Castillo vs Nam Danh3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian McQuillan / Scott Hammerton vs Christopher Cameron / Khai Du6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Roch: Cameron/Stutzman54161128249
2Xu54131431241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
3.89
Stephen Repass
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Michael Bupp
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Gregg Hartvigsen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Manuel Castillo
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Brian McQuillan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Wagstaff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Pastorella
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Scott Hammerton
published
Tane Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Xunyi Xu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manuel Castillo + Stephen Repass2548% games+11.5% vs expected
Stephen Repass + Michael Bupp7256% games+3.5% vs expected
Manuel Castillo + Michael Bupp5844% games−0.5% vs expected
Gregg Hartvigsen + Xunyi Xu4655% games−2.2% vs expected
Gregg Hartvigsen + Michael Bupp3450% games−4.7% vs expected
Tane Robinson + Brian McQuillan2446% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Wagstaff + Michael Bupp314 matchesnot enough data
Gregg Hartvigsen + Manuel Castillo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ian Gregory-Davis
44W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.90
Stephen Repass
18W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Michael Bupp
105W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Gregg Hartvigsen
26W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Manuel Castillo
22W–34L career · 8 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.61
Brian McQuillan
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Wagstaff
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Pastorella
23W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Hammerton
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tane Robinson
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Xunyi Xu
42W–38L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.