Teams

Bagwell/Bartlett - Genesis, Rock Road

2021 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-27vs Seitz - Genesis TopekaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bagwell / Reycee Bartlett vs Rachel Seitz / Ali Wilson1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Allison Tripp6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Katie Qu vs Laura Leinwetter / Karen Speaks0-6, 2-6
2021-03-27vs Seitz - Genesis TopekaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Katie Qu vs Ali Wilson / Anna Simoneau2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Rachel Seitz6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesReycee Bartlett / Kathleen Bagwell vs Karen Speaks / Destiny MacE4-6, 3-6
2021-03-13vs 3.5W Pushyk-Genesis Rock RdLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bagwell / Patricia Thompson vs Linda Jones / Linda Anderson1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Pamela McCullough6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBobbie Lee / DENISE OBR vs Cindy Hull / DeAnn White1-6, 2-6
2021-02-28vs Ball/JargoLost 12
L#1 DoublesSeok Lim / Bobbie Lee vs Karen Jargo / Camille Nyberg2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Anne Burris6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesReycee Bartlett / Maggie Seitz vs Diane Ball / Sara Streich2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-02-21vs 3.5W Pushyk-Genesis Rock RdWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Bagwell / Rachel McMahon vs Mitzi Hackney / DeAnn White6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Linda Anderson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesReycee Bartlett / Maggie Seitz vs Marsha Mawhirter / Brenda Munds3-6, 6-7
2021-01-31vs Angell - Genesis, SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bagwell / Seok Lim vs Beth Fischer / MARTHA SWEENEY3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Pam Geihsler6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKIRAN Kumar / Ginger Brown vs Vanessa Burns / Jean Boardman2-6, 1-6
2021-01-31vs Angell - Genesis, SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesReycee Bartlett / Rachel McMahon vs Vanessa Burns / Pam Geihsler7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBobbie Lee vs Beth Fischer1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Bagwell / Patricia Thompson vs Jean Boardman / MARTHA SWEENEY6-3, 7-6
2021-01-23vs Ball/JargoWon 21
W#1 DoublesReycee Bartlett / Rachel McMahon vs Linda Criser / Diane Ball6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLaurel Bogner vs Anne Burris6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Bobbie Lee vs Janet Clopine / Lea Ann Mcilvain4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Maggie Seitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Rachel McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.94
KIRAN Kumar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Bobbie Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Katie Qu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Kathleen Bagwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Patricia Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.62
DENISE OBR
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Laurel Bogner
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published
Reycee Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Seok Lim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reycee Bartlett + Rachel McMahon5261% games+9.3% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Patricia Thompson8850% games+1.3% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Katie Qu10752% games−1.9% vs expected
Patricia Thompson + Katie Qu7749% games−3.3% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + KIRAN Kumar8558% gamesnot enough data
Reycee Bartlett + Laurel Bogner314 matchesnot enough data
KIRAN Kumar + Patricia Thompson224 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Seitz + Reycee Bartlett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Seitz
90W–33L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
Rachel McMahon
53W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
KIRAN Kumar
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Bobbie Lee
61W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
Katie Qu
50W–45L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Kathleen Bagwell
57W–84L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Patricia Thompson
82W–72L career · 9 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
DENISE OBR
97W–114L career · 7 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
Laurel Bogner
49W–12L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Reycee Bartlett
54W–51L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Seok Lim
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.