Teams

Ma.Gonella18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-24vs La.McRee18S3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesCayt Kirkman vs Emily Andino6-1, 6-1
2024-07-17vs Ma.Burton18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Jennifer Boney6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Savannah Davidsson6-1, 6-3
2024-07-10vs Ka.Johnston18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Megan Havel0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Joanne Kearney6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-01Lost 01
L#3 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Heather Tuttle4-6, 4-6
2024-06-19vs Je.Williams18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Ellina Max6-1, 6-1
2024-06-05vs Sh.Brodsgaard18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Summer DuMont6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Carrie Russell2-6, 2-6
2024-05-29vs Na.Rodriguez18S3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesCayt Kirkman vs Natalie Rodriguez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs Br.Humphrey18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Taylor Hawkland6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAnn Garey vs Christine Harris6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
3.09
Sarah Overholser
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Kari Knoblauch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.90
Cayt Kirkman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
2.42
Emily Boyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cayt Kirkman + Kari Knoblauch6453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Ann Gonella
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Kari Knoblauch
113W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Cayt Kirkman
75W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
2.67
Emily Boyer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%70%30%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.