Teams

AR/Johnson/GHS

2023 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-27vs OK/Culver/TulsaWon 21
L#1 DoublesJudy Thompson / Mary Galloway vs Vibsen Lay / Kitty Morel3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFaye Hudson / Janet McAdams vs Vivienne Culver / Georgia Burd7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoann Privitello / Judy Starrett vs Deborah Lee / Bonnie Canfield6-3, 6-3
2023-04-26vs TX/Vernor/San AntonioLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Thompson / Cheri Williams vs Rosemary Vernor / Terry Peel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFaye Hudson / Janet McAdams vs Sheila Wilson / Margaret Canby6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLavada Johnson / Judy Starrett vs Sydney Burton / Janet Hudson1-6, 2-6
2023-04-25vs AR/Wallman/NWALost 03
L#1 DoublesFaye Hudson / Cheri Williams vs Leslie Jones / Sandra Quinn1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Starrett / Mary Galloway vs Norma Hamm / Sara Bainbridge0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Taylor / Janet McAdams vs Linda Wallman / Maggie Johnston6-7, 2-6
2023-04-25vs AR/Dill/NLRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoann Privitello / Judy Starrett vs Elizabeth Buchanan / Janie Calvert2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Thompson / Janet McAdams vs Karen Bryant / Jane Schubert6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFaye Hudson / Cheri Williams vs Susan Coleman / Becky Marks2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AR/Wallman/NWA3184873
2AR/Dill/NLR319311100
3AR/Byrd/MtnHm317513107
4MO/VOGEL22751189
5TX/Vernor/San Antonio22751293
6LA/Smith226613100
7AR/Wood/LR226613104
8OK/Culver/Tulsa226613113
9AR/Johnson/GHS1321020132
10AR/Finton/HSV0421021138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Joann Privitello
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Cheri Williams
published 3
2.71
Faye Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Janet McAdams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Starrett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lavada Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Galloway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Starrett + Joann Privitello3348% gamesnot enough data
Faye Hudson + Janet McAdams2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joann Privitello
29W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cheri Williams
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Faye Hudson
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
Janet McAdams
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Starrett
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Thompson
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lavada Johnson
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mary Galloway
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.