Teams

BSF:Nguyen

2021 NCT Tri Level men · 4.0 Tri Level Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-23vs FV:Smashers:Srinivasan/SuttmeierLost 01
L#1 DoublesRob Borea / Raul Valdes vs Alok Arora / Peter Suttmeier4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-16vs FV:FVRC-B:ColemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Goodwin / Rob Borea vs Rohan Brown / Brooke Tyler IV6-3, 6-2
2021-11-09vs MRC:Court Jesters:MayoWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaul Valdes / Rob Borea vs Todd Schuck / John Reisert6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-02vs FV:ParekhLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Goodwin / Raul Valdes vs Gustavo Echel / Alex Trett7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-19vs FV:Smashers:Srinivasan/SuttmeierWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiem Nguyen / David Goodwin vs Peter Suttmeier / Andrew Wollner7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-12vs FV:FVRC-B:ColemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiem Nguyen / Rob Borea vs Daniel Lehnhoff / Rohan Brown6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-06vs MRC:Court Jesters:MayoLost 01
L#1 DoublesRaul Valdes / David Goodwin vs John Reisert / Glenn Lavallee7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-09-28vs FV:ParekhWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiem Nguyen / Rob Borea vs Todd Piker / Kevin Imbt6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Tri Level Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:Court Jesters:Mayo6262871
2BSF:Nguyen53531080
3FV:Parekh44441076
4FV:Smashers:Srinivasan/Suttmeier44441189
5FV:FVRC-B:Coleman17171495

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Rob Borea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Raul Valdes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Liem Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
David Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Goodwin + Raul Valdes8456% games+5.2% vs expected
Liem Nguyen + Raul Valdes4355% games+2.7% vs expected
Raul Valdes + Rob Borea4356% games+2.6% vs expected
David Goodwin + Liem Nguyen6354% games+2.6% vs expected
Liem Nguyen + Rob Borea303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rob Borea
54W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
Raul Valdes
104W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Liem Nguyen
119W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
David Goodwin
73W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.