Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/3.0/Porras/CCC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Dennis Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Singles 9% · published 3
2.66
Craig Fortune
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.38
Alison Leben
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
2.32
Collins Preston
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
2.23
April Senclair Duran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.85
AYLEEN PACE
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jorge Kareh
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Lexi Torres
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Marisela Scott
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Mike Scott
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Monica Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Regina Porras
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Ruben Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Shannon Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruben Ramirez + Dennis Rodriguez7552% gamesnot enough data
Marisela Scott + Alison Leben6457% gamesnot enough data
Ruben Ramirez + Jorge Kareh4545% gamesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + Alison Leben5455% gamesnot enough data
Monica Ramirez + AYLEEN PACE2633% gamesnot enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz + Collins Preston1639% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Rodriguez + Jorge Kareh2446% gamesnot enough data
Craig Fortune + Jorge Kareh2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dennis Rodriguez
45W–57L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Craig Fortune
22W–52L career · 14 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Alison Leben
33W–31L career · 34 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Collins Preston
17W–69L career · 28 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
April Senclair Duran
2W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
AYLEEN PACE
4W–38L career · 18 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Jorge Kareh
67W–100L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lexi Torres
7W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–68L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisela Scott
18W–28L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Scott
16W–36L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Ramirez
16W–60L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Regina Porras
20W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruben Ramirez
30W–48L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
36W–89L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.