Teams

SDNC 3.0 Rancho Santa Fe TC/ Ortel (2:3)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs SDNC 3.0 RPTC/ Schroeder (2:3)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Ruzich / Marisel Bastias vs Tatiana Bourd / Maria Schneider6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Jill Ruzich vs Susana M Smith / Mary Behnam1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElia Surran / Holly Carter vs Brittan Bliss / Caroline Vance6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Ortel / Marisel Bastias vs Cynthia Rhodes / Sandra Uribe6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaritia Walper / Jill Ruzich vs Deanne Davis / Sheenoo Sharma6-1, 6-0
2022-05-10vs SDNC 3.0 Morgan Run/ Lemon (3:2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Jill Ruzich vs Karen Pado / Marni Miller7-6, 6-0
2022-05-03vs SDNC 3.0 Kit Carson/ So (3:2)Split 11
L#2 DoublesJill Ruzich / Cynthia Hudson vs Betsy San Jose / Julie Witsken6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Ortel / Marisel Bastias vs Cecilia Lusky / Jana Markley6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Hudson / Jill Ruzich vs Krystal Champion / Jessica Fosse6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElia Surran / Holly Carter vs Lauren Clark / Janie Munce6-3, 6-3
2022-04-22vs SDNC 3.0 RPTC/ Schroeder (2:3)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaritia Walper / Elia Surran vs Julie Reid / Khanh Nguyen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Rachael Thompson
published
3.19
Marisel Bastias
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Molly Tanner
published
3.09
Juliana Guillory
published
2.93
Ann Ortel
published 3.5
2.87
Jill Ruzich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Holly Carter
published 3
2.80
2.77
Elia Surran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
LJ Nicholas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elia Surran + Jill Ruzich131946% games−7.1% vs expected
Marisel Bastias + Jill Ruzich81051% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachael Thompson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Marisel Bastias
116W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Molly Tanner
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Juliana Guillory
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ann Ortel
0W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Jill Ruzich
79W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Holly Carter
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Brittney Matzinger
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Elia Surran
56W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
LJ Nicholas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.