Teams

3-JMontague-CCC 40

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-10vs 2-ROakley-EV 40 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Will Johnson vs Chris Reeves / Lee Goldberg1-6, 2-6
2023-09-26vs 4-RMcGarrah-HRSplit 11
W#2 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Brent Fox vs Jerome Croan / Mattias Rostin7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRobert Long / Rick Edmunds vs George Corbett / JEFF CHANDLER1-6, 4-6
2023-09-19vs 5-MBland-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher LeGrand / Arash Chehrazi vs Gary Glish / Chris Stephenson3-6, 2-6
2023-09-05vs 2-ROakley-EV 40 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesOmid Uskowi / Arash Chehrazi vs Aaron Young / Ryan Boyles7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-22vs 4-RMcGarrah-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Riedel / Arash Chehrazi vs JEFF CHANDLER / Mattias Rostin3-6, 2-6
2023-08-08vs 1-MHolt-HS-6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / Stephen Arrowood vs Scott Hartman / Chris Lee6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
published
3.33
Arash Chehrazi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Rick Edmunds
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Robert Long
published
2.83
2.76
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
2.70
Mark Rhoades
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3545% games−0.9% vs expected
Christopher LeGrand + Mark Rhoades224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3
Rick Edmunds
76W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.03
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Christopher LeGrand
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brent Fox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Rhoades
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.