Teams

JTC - Cribb

2022 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Stephanie Ryan vs Tara Edelstein / Debbie McMillan4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Woody / Kim Magee vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Hadleigh Green2-6, 3-6
2022-12-03vs DB - TownsendSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Kim Magee vs Darby Townsend / Tammy Miller1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Andrus / Kannika Torres vs Frances Revere / Susan Chase6-4, 6-2
2022-12-01vs WS - McLaughlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Stephanie Ryan vs Laurie McLaughlin / Natalie Ebner6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Magee / Courtney Woody vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Heather Gibson0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKannika Torres / Mary Cribb vs Rachel Rodriguez / Wheeler Crawford4-6, 5-7
2022-11-12vs DB - TownsendLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Cribb / Jigisha Shah vs Tammy Miller / Marlene Townsend3-6, 1-6
2022-10-15vs DB - TownsendSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Jigisha Shah vs Tammy Miller / Shirley Clark6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Magee / Courtney Woody vs Michelle Ivanowski / Marlene Townsend6-1, 6-1
2022-10-15vs WS - McLaughlinWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Andrus / Kannika Torres vs Aurymar Rodriguez / Laurie McLaughlin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Cribb / Stephanie Ryan vs Jennine Brandt / Taiana Mendez6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-01vs WS - McLaughlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Magee / Courtney Woody vs Lindy Archambeau / Aurymar Rodriguez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJigisha Shah / Mary Cribb vs Jennine Brandt / Laurie McLaughlin6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Woody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.85
Alison Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.40
Stephanie Ryan
published
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
Ali Messenger
published 3.5
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Lindsey Wilson
published
Mary Cribb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Andrus + Kim Magee1537% games−8.6% vs expected
Mary Cribb + Courtney Woody2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Woody
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Stephanie Ryan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ali Messenger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Lindsey Wilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Cribb
34W–56L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.