Teams

R.Hatlen 40+

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-10vs F.AllisonLost 02
L#2 DoublesJohn Whalen / Aaron Vedder vs David McNeill / Jeff Chaffin6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRoger Hatlen / James McCown vs Frank Allison / Tim Lyon4-6, 2-6
2023-05-03Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAaron Vedder vs Jason Smith2-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs T.SherburneLost 03
L#1 DoublesDamien Graham / Robert Kent vs Ted Sherburne / Bradford Minsley3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKurt Ihly / Joey Jacobs vs Penn Holderness / Robert Weaver6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames McCown / Kevin Tombs vs Mike Hennen / Bryan Barker1-6, 1-6
2023-03-29vs J.DiamondLost 03
L#1 DoublesKurt Ihly / Joey Jacobs vs Steven Miller / Scott Anderson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDamien Graham / Kevin Tombs vs Ken Lawton / Tom Sparks2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJames McCown / John Whalen vs John Diamond / Ken Nowell6-7, 0-6
2023-03-27vs L.BrockLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames McCown / Aaron Vedder vs Jonathan Jenkins / Preston Waldo1-6, 4-6
2023-03-15vs F.AllisonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKurt Ihly / Joey Jacobs vs Joseph Smith / Jeff Chaffin3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJames McCown vs Farr Curlin7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDamien Graham / Michael Hamlett vs Larry Leins / Larry Essary6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-08vs J.Jones 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKurt Ihly / Robert Kent vs Tyler Salisbury / Kevin Wolborsky1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDamien Graham / James McCown vs Terence McKee / Frank Moser6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jason Grunberg
published
3.81
Roger Hatlen
published
3.79
Robert Kent
published
3.78
Michael Hamlett
published
Kurt Ihly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Damien Graham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
James McCown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kevin Tombs
published
3.12
Aaron Vedder
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Rod Boyle
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rod Boyle + James McCown3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Grunberg
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Robert Kent
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Michael Hamlett
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Kurt Ihly
66W–35L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Damien Graham
28W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
James McCown
39W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kevin Tombs
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Aaron Vedder
61W–86L career · 9 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Rod Boyle
64W–75L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.