Teams

Je.Chaffin55M

2025 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-23vs Je.Monaghen55MWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Judith Gallagher vs Philip Gugliotta / Nancy Gugliotta6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Sandra Rhoades vs Susan Hembarsky / Todd Driscoll6-0, 6-2
2025-07-22vs St.Rabby55MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanet Sprague / Jeff Chaffin vs Dana Weiland / John Diamond1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Riley / Larry Essary vs Tiffany Harris / Mark Combs6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-15vs Lo.Hatlen55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Sheila Riley vs Nikki DAmbrose / John Whalen4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Sprague / David McNeill vs Mark Osborn / Noelle Jackson3-6, 5-7
2025-06-25vs Je.Madia55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLarry Essary / Sheila Riley vs Laura Hiller / Scott Riley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Sprague / David McNeill vs Scott Anderson / Marti Crane3-6, 3-6
2025-06-18vs Bi.Francis55MLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid McNeill / Judith Gallagher vs Kep Paylor / Elizabeth Hensley7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Pamela McCollum vs Keith Satisky / Isabelle Homes Gesher5-7, 5-7
2025-06-11vs Re.Procter55MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLarry Essary / Judith Gallagher vs Jean Harrold / Jack Pyritz1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Anneliese Carr vs Kana Brinckerhoff / Michael Hamlett6-4, 6-3
2025-06-04vs Te.McKee55MLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid McNeill / Anneliese Carr vs Karen McKee / Kevin Wolborsky3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Janet Sprague
published
3.65
Larry Essary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Jeff Chaffin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
David McNeill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Anneliese Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Sheila Riley
published
3.26
Sandra Rhoades
published
3.13
Judith Gallagher
published
Jane Britt
published
Pamela McCollum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David McNeill + Anneliese Carr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Sprague
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Larry Essary
110W–138L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Jeff Chaffin
77W–121L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
David McNeill
104W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Anneliese Carr
87W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Sheila Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
Sandra Rhoades
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Judith Gallagher
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.13
Jane Britt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela McCollum
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.