Teams

Kuhn 2024 Mens 4.0

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.89 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-10vs ThomassonLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Anderson / Jack Lavinder vs Enrico Capitan / Richard Sexton7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-04vs GladdenWon 20
W#1 DoublesGreg Critcher / Brian Timian vs Gary Gladden / Steve Newcomer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmil Mara / Jack Lavinder vs Greg Leihy / Jim Tacka6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-02vs GladdenWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Critcher / Jack Lavinder vs Anthony Hoffman / Key Sar6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-27vs GladdenLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Critcher / Michael Witting vs Andrew Bing / Jim Tacka1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-25vs ThomassonWon 10
W#1 SinglesGreg Critcher vs Thangaavel Chandrasekaron7-5, 6-3
2024-04-13vs ThomassonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGreg Critcher / Andre Taggart vs Alan Chaney / Jay McGinnis-Tingle5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJack Lavinder / Andrew Isch vs Craig Elliott / Richard Sexton4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Bryan Williams
published 4
3.90
Greg Critcher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.76
Jack Lavinder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Alexis Toussaint
published 4
3.75
Andre Taggart
published 4
3.54
Brian Kuhn
published 4
3.51
Michael Witting
published
3.41
Ezhilan Ulaganathan
published
3.25
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
3.24
Michael Bernhard
published
3.16
Brian Timian
published 3.5
3.16
Jorge Paucar
published
Paul Moskios
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Williams
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Greg Critcher
47W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Jack Lavinder
97W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Alexis Toussaint
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christopher Gowen
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andre Taggart
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Brian Kuhn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Michael Witting
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Ezhilan Ulaganathan
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Michael Bernhard
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Brian Timian
2W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Jorge Paucar
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Paul Moskios
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.