Teams

Alisal-Alley Cats

Adult 18 & Over - SB Spring · SB - Women - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesWalden Bohnet / Clare Gonzalez vs Kersten Barr / Kyra Rogers6-7, 1-6
2022-06-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesWalden Bohnet / Clare Gonzalez vs Angela Wick / Anne Mitchell6-3, 6-4
2022-05-29vs Muni-TroublemakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Linquiti / Yolanda Ramirez vs Susanna McMahon / Karen Solomon1-6, 5-7
2022-05-15vs SBTC-Lemon DropsLost 01
L#1 DoublesWalden Bohnet / Clare Gonzalez vs Lisa MacHado / Amy Jakobson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-08vs Muni-TroublemakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJaclyn Park / Tina Panos vs Marjie Kirn / Inna Taranchenko4-6, 2-6
2022-05-01vs SBTC-Lemon DropsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlicia Linquiti vs Nicole Halabisky6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWalden Bohnet / Clare Gonzalez vs Linda Stirling / Kathleen Burt6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesWalden Bohnet / Nancy Hussey vs Kristin Mcwilliams / Carrie Randolph2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Alicia Linquiti
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Jen Haskell
published
3.51
MARGARET LEARMONTH
published
3.35
Tina Panos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Heather Saarloos
published 3.5
3.30
Jaclyn Park
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Carole Harder
published 3.5
Clare Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.23
Walden Bohnet
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.75
Nina Dall Armi
published
Maria Fazio
published
Melinda Johnston
published
Sharon Fox
published
Yolanda Ramirez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Walden Bohnet + Jaclyn Park6361% games+4.5% vs expected
Jaclyn Park + Tina Panos312056% games+3.4% vs expected
Jaclyn Park + Alicia Linquiti3356% gamesnot enough data
Alicia Linquiti + Tina Panos3250% gamesnot enough data
Jen Haskell + Yolanda Ramirez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alicia Linquiti
91W–67L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jen Haskell
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
MARGARET LEARMONTH
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Tina Panos
61W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Heather Saarloos
0W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Jaclyn Park
86W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carole Harder
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Clare Gonzalez
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Walden Bohnet
78W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Nina Dall Armi
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Gamble Parks Douville
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Fazio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Johnston
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Fox
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yolanda Ramirez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.