Teams

WNCCA

2026 Adult 55 and Over League · 6.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-26vs Wahine TennisWon 30
W#1 DoublesShari Kochiyama / Sharon Vidal vs Norene Ihori / Dorothy Umeda6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJodi Carlson / Josephine Pia vs Alison Richards / Janice Mizusawa6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Wheat / Iris Katsura vs Anne Hayashida / Reiko Tom7-6, 7-6
2026-04-24vs Alley CatsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaori Ogawa / Sharon Vidal vs Diane Nakahodo / Rae Tadaki6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShari Kochiyama / Patty Schmitz vs Yoshimi Frumson / Sonavie Ong6-7, 3-6
2026-04-19vs Happy Happy Hour!Won 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Locquiao / Sharon Vidal vs Darlene Chang / Shari Choy6-4, 6-5
L#2 DoublesKaori Ogawa / Josephine Pia vs Beth Choy / Iris Tomita4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJodi Carlson / Angelita Yu-crowley vs Suzanne Bernstein / Alicia Mcclaverty6-1, 6-3
2026-04-04vs No BagelsLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatty Schmitz / Sharon Vidal vs Julie Chang / Sharon Stehlik6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Laborte / Angelita Yu-crowley vs Valerie Lee / Joanne Sakamaki2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJodi Carlson / Josephine Pia vs Estella Berg / Celia Shen0-6, 2-6
2026-03-29vs Lucky ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Ramos / Sharon Vidal vs Raelene Domingues / Susan Shingle6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaori Ogawa / Susan Locquiao vs Debby Shin / Karen Griffon6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesIris Katsura / Pam Wheat vs Susan Ichinose / PJ Ellison6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-28vs LS 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesHelen Ramos / Kaori Ogawa vs Cheryl Hay / Ada Ozaki2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Locquiao / Patty Schmitz vs Susan Shintani / Debbie Nakaoka6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJodi Carlson / Josephine Pia vs Lois Saruwatari / Lynette Furukawa6-4, 6-2
2026-03-08vs KRC StrikersWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Ramos / Sharon Vidal vs Shannon Afarin / Lisa Gentry6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJodi Carlson / Angelita Yu-crowley vs Wylie Nash / Cindy Siok6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Ornellas / Pam Wheat vs Maureen O'Guin / Gwenette Higa7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCCA5212919172
2Lucky Shots4312923191
3LS 225101125194
4KRC Strikers2581329203
5Wahine Tennis1641737242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jacqueline Ornellas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Sharon Vidal
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.13
Iris Katsura
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Helen Ramos
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.02
Susan Locquiao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Kaori Ogawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Angelita Yu-crowley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Jodi Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Patty Schmitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Carolyn Laborte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Shari Kochiyama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Josephine Pia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.39
Pam Wheat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Maria Fe Bugal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shari Kochiyama + Pam Wheat0628% gamesnot enough data
Helen Ramos + Josephine Pia224 matchesnot enough data
Helen Ramos + Kaori Ogawa314 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Carlson + Angelita Yu-crowley134 matchesnot enough data
Helen Ramos + Maria Fe Bugal213 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Pia + Jodi Carlson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Ornellas
34W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Sharon Vidal
117W–62L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Iris Katsura
102W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Helen Ramos
80W–76L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Susan Locquiao
89W–55L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kaori Ogawa
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Angelita Yu-crowley
8W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Jodi Carlson
17W–33L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Patty Schmitz
35W–82L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Carolyn Laborte
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Shari Kochiyama
20W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Josephine Pia
22W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Pam Wheat
34W–58L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Maria Fe Bugal
8W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.