Teams

Lieber

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-28vs IranshadLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Fleming / Jason Edmonds vs Hayan Marouf / John Olson2-6, 4-6
2022-06-26vs IranshadSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Hosie / John Anderson vs Houston Ward / Rahul Hingorani7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Jason Edmonds vs Juan Borga / Byron Levy6-7, 3-6
2022-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Edmonds / Zachary Jones vs Michael Liu / Chris Jeong6-4, 6-4
2022-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Edmonds / John Anderson vs Michael Liu / Chris Jeong6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-14vs IranshadWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Andrew Harrington vs Hayan Marouf / John Olson7-6, 7-6
2022-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Zachary Jones vs Rahul Hingorani / Houston Ward6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-06-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Hosie / Thomas Jeffers vs Michael Liu / Chris Jeong4-6, 3-6
2022-05-31vs IranshadWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Steinberg / Matthew Geppi vs Barghav Hariharan / Byron Levy7-6, 6-3
2022-05-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Modderno / James Hosie vs Michael Liu / Chris Jeong0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
James Hosie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Matthew Geppi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.40
Michael Mironchenko
published
4.30
Zachary Jones
published
Andrew Harrington
published
Jason Edmonds
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Jeffers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Hosie + Zachary Jones404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Hosie
53W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
4.48
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
Michael Mironchenko
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
4.40
Zachary Jones
30W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Andrew Harrington
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Edmonds
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Jeffers
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.