Teams

MO - Mock/Daniel

2025 Combo 18 & Over Women Day - Mobile · 5.5 Women Day 18

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-10vs MTC - MurphyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bass / Jennifer Hammond vs Megan Pennington / Mary Hasser6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mock / Amanda Middleton vs Mitzi Seales / Leana Ott6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Montz / Meredith Davis vs Charlotte Baker / Sohee Kim6-2, 7-5
2025-06-26vs Fairhope - Kessler / GavinSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Daniel / Amanda Middleton vs Taylor Kessler / Amy Kranz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeredith Davis / Amanda Montz vs Emily Kane / Melanie McBrearty6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs Fairhope - Crowley 5.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bass / Susan Nance vs Amanda Calhoun / Jill Emmertson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Middleton / Abbie McCullough vs Karen Bowman / Anne Canon6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Howard / Amanda Montz vs Prudence Meadors / Catharine Burch7-5, 6-1
2025-06-12vs Lott Park - Lieb/SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mock / Jennifer Hammond vs Allyson Sommer / Kristen Blackmer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Middleton / Abbie McCullough vs Erin Putnam / Jamie Wright6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Shirley / Meredith Davis vs Libbie Allen / Sarah Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-05vs CCM - Tulowitzki/StarrWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Howard / Susan Nance vs Kim Laan / Allison Starr5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mock / Amanda Middleton vs Elizabeth Meador / Terrell Ewing5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAbbie McCullough / Kim Sedergran vs Sarah Thomas / Jamie Flotte6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women Day 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Ashley Howard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Meredith Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Jennifer Mock
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Abbie McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Stephanie Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.84
Joanna Bass
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Amanda Middleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Susan Nance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Amanda Montz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Kim Sedergran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Bass + Stephanie Daniel10852% games+0.3% vs expected
Stephanie Daniel + Amanda Middleton3352% games−5.2% vs expected
Kim Sedergran + Abbie McCullough314 matchesnot enough data
Joanna Bass + Ashley Howard404 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Davis + Stephanie Daniel123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Mock + Ashley Howard213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Mock + Amanda Middleton303 matchesnot enough data
Abbie McCullough + Ashley Howard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Howard
27W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Meredith Davis
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Jennifer Mock
25W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Abbie McCullough
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Stephanie Daniel
38W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Joanna Bass
29W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Amanda Middleton
26W–32L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Susan Nance
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
2.5
Amanda Montz
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Kim Sedergran
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.