Teams

Hagen

2026 40&Over Mixed · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-18vs Northern: 6.0mxd40 RaffaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Richards / Eric Nickerson vs Whitney Phelps / Paul Hook3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMicheline Ford / Brian Hagen vs Meghan Kelly / Peter Campito Sr2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAshley Boyer / Ashok Sehgal vs Catherine Herman / Jeffrey Klamka6-2, 6-0
2026-04-11vs SRYMCA 6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMia Barbera / Ron Wolner vs Matthew Hockenos / Allyson Byrne2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargot Tohn / Eric Nickerson vs Colleen Yates / Timothy Yates0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMicheline Ford / Brian Hagen vs Pauline Cusick / Remus Preda7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-28vs No Shirt. No Shoes. No Service.Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMicheline Ford / Don Savage vs Youjung Byun / Basant Kumar1-6
L#2 DoublesMargot Tohn / Eric Nickerson vs Lynn Rogers / Jeffrey Haff4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYvonne Ryan / Ron Wolner vs Meagan Mann / Fred Boehrer3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-21vs Northern: 6.0mxd40 RaffaLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Nickerson / Ashley Boyer vs Linda Dygert / Peter Howard2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJessica Hayashi / Felton McLaughlin vs Suzanne Hauber / Paul Hook2-6, 0-6
2026-03-14vs SRYMCA 6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Hayashi / Don Savage vs Damon Georgia / Allyson Byrne0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Hagen / Brian Hagen vs Lisa Schwartz / Matthew Hockenos1-6, 1-6
2026-03-07vs SRYMCA 6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Richards / Eric Nickerson vs Matthew Hockenos / Lisa Schwartz0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Hagen / Felton McLaughlin vs Colleen Yates / Timothy Yates1-6, 0-6
2026-02-28vs No Shirt. No Shoes. No Service.Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hagen / Brian Hagen vs Grace Cunningham / Stephen Acquario2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMia Barbera / Eric Nickerson vs Ginny Rust / Eric Lindh6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMicheline Ford / Felton McLaughlin vs Stacey McGovern / George Koh5-7, 2-6
2026-02-14vs Northern: 6.0mxd40 RaffaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hagen / Brian Hagen vs Linda Dygert / Willem Blindenbach2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMargot Tohn / Ron Wolner vs Jo Anne Raffa / Jeffrey Klamka5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Hayashi / Felton McLaughlin vs Lorraine Lemons / James Davies1-6, 0-6
2026-01-31vs No Shirt. No Shoes. No Service.Won 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Richards / Eric Nickerson vs Stacey McGovern / Girish Ramanathan1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMicheline Ford / Brian Hagen vs Youjung Byun / Malik Jones6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargot Tohn / Ashok Sehgal vs Grace Cunningham / Stephen Acquario7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Brian Hagen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Don Savage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Felton McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Mia Barbera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Yvonne Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Ashley Boyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Margot Tohn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ashok Sehgal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Deborah Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Eric Nickerson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.18
Jessica Hayashi
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.15
Micheline Ford
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Ron Wolner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Nickerson + Deborah Richards033 matchesnot enough data
Micheline Ford + Brian Hagen123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Hagen + Sarah Hagen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Hagen
15W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Don Savage
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Felton McLaughlin
5W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
Mia Barbera
60W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Yvonne Ryan
54W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ashley Boyer
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Margot Tohn
49W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ashok Sehgal
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Deborah Richards
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Eric Nickerson
29W–141L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Jessica Hayashi
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Micheline Ford
10W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.15
Ron Wolner
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Hagen
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.