Teams

LRSica-Sheheen/Trump

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesRenee Sica / Allison Nelin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-07vs LBHarris/NMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Cooper / MaryGwen Murash vs Erin MacAulay / Jennife Roberts2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErin Finn / Llnon North vs Bridgette Ashbrook / Julie Whittington6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-07vs LSMcCueTakesBarber/EdgemoorWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Blackwell / Allison Nelin vs Louisa Dow / Shelly McCue6-4, 6-3
2022-09-23vs LKNorcross/TrumpWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlison Cooper / MaryGwen Murash vs Lesley Crabb / Dawn Aldrich1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Cindy Smithy vs Katrina Childers / Jessica Babington7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Finn / Llnon North vs Meghan Connolly / Kristine Morganti6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-16vs LWGO-Goodwin/6.5 Fri 18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Alison Cooper vs Jennifer Arko / Cindy Japec4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-09vs LALight/Griffin/PeninsulaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Nelin / Kimberly Sheheen vs Christine Tattersfield / Jenny Yaudes6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-02vs LMUrban/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Cooper / MaryGwen Murash vs Candace Newman / Crystal Regan6-2, 6-2
2022-08-19vs LBKU-Kumar/PAC 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Nelin / Llnon North vs Marsha Wall / Mirjana Milcic4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Micaela Brewer
published
3.20
Allison Nelin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Sheheen
published
3.03
Llnon North
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Jennifer Plaster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Erin Finn
published 3
2.57
Ann Baker
published 3
Renee Sica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Sheheen + Jennifer Plaster2343% games+3.7% vs expected
Jennifer Plaster + MaryGwen Murash4354% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Plaster + Allison Nelin5168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 8 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Micaela Brewer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Allison Nelin
84W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kimberly Sheheen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Llnon North
72W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Jennifer Plaster
119W–119L career · 1 line in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Erin Finn
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Ann Baker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Renee Sica
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.