Teams

SOL:Straight Outta Solaris:Spenner

2022 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed - 1

18 players · average NTRP 4.23 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoLost 02
L#1 DoublesSean Burns / Lindsay Pell vs Eugenia Kovalev / Peter Snell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHelen Chun / Robert Chun vs John Pagano / Wendy Harris1-6, 2-6
2022-05-21vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLindsay Pell / Sean Burns vs Paul Groves / Christina Scherwin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Chun / Robert Chun vs Olga Harvey / David van Zyl2-6, 1-6
2022-05-15vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMitchell Low / Laura Emerson vs Scott Neufeld / Kimelle McCarthy6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLindsay Pell / Craig Spenner vs Shirley Berliner / Jeffrey Brozek1-6, 1-6
2022-05-07vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLindsay Pell / Sean Burns vs Paul Smailes / Olga Harvey7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Youn / Heather Rich vs Yvonne D'aquino / Jeffrey Brozek3-6, 2-6
2022-04-22vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Youn / Louise Scrivines vs Olga Harvey / Paul Smailes4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Chun / Robert Chun vs John Pagano / Yvonne D'aquino3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Spenner / Lindsay Pell vs Kimelle McCarthy / Peter Snell2-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs TCT:Club Ed:PaganoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Hawe / Helen Chun vs Mark Schiller / Nan Cunningham7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Emerson / Craig Spenner vs Kimelle McCarthy / Scott Neufeld0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Mixed - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SOL:Straight Outta Solaris:Spenner0641430206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Lily Riedel
published 4.5
4.25
Mitchell Low
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brett Howard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Heather Rich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.15
Laura Emerson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Louise Scrivines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Laura Treanor Coury
published
4.00
Carole Allers
published 4.5
3.84
Mary Mondello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Lindsay Pell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Robert Chun
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.76
Richard Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Helen Chun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Dorothy Spenner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Craig Spenner
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Brian Hawe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Youn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Rich + Thomas Youn11755% games+13.7% vs expected
Laura Emerson + Brett Howard21460% games+8.6% vs expected
Lindsay Pell + Sean Burns14754% games+5.8% vs expected
Laura Emerson + Craig Spenner121050% games+4.0% vs expected
Dorothy Spenner + Brett Howard5355% games+3.2% vs expected
Helen Chun + Robert Chun243847% games−7.6% vs expected
Mitchell Low + Dorothy Spenner5545% games−13.9% vs expected
Dorothy Spenner + Craig Spenner1928% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lily Riedel
154W–72L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Mitchell Low
276W–157L career · 1 line in 2022
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Brett Howard
176W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Heather Rich
129W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
98%2%<1%
4.24
Laura Emerson
177W–142L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Louise Scrivines
106W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
Laura Treanor Coury
67W–45L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Carole Allers
186W–140L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Mary Mondello
243W–170L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Lindsay Pell
168W–139L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Robert Chun
165W–157L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Richard Long
98W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Helen Chun
227W–220L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Dorothy Spenner
150W–174L career · 3 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Craig Spenner
121W–164L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Brian Hawe
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Burns
105W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Youn
72W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.