Teams

Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)

2026 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-14vs Miami/Buaiz/18&over4.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Orrego / James Baker vs Marco Avila / Alberto Espejo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJavier Rodriguez / Ryan Anania vs Mauricio Gutierrez / CHAGIN BUAIZ3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Mauricio Marciales vs Ricardo Linares / Sebastian Perez6-6
2025-11-04vs Fascell ForceLost 12
W#1 DoublesJavier Rodriguez / Mauricio Marciales vs Benjamin Bragard / Miguel Taino6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJulio Belandria vs Santiago Rojas4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Kunz vs Oscar Pena3-6, 5-7
2025-10-24vs Miami/Buaiz/18&over4.0MLost 04
L#1 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Thomas Kunz vs Federico Rossi / Diego Blanco6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRyan Anania vs Ryan Alvarez6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJulio Belandria / Martin Marciales vs CHAGIN BUAIZ / Marco Avila4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMauricio Marciales vs Mauricio Gutierrez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-21vs Molinari (Crandon Park)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJavier Rodriguez / Ryan Anania vs Daniele del Gaudio / Samuel Kaczynski6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDavid Orrego vs Alex Wilson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Kunz / Julio Belandria vs Samuel Valeri / Tomas Matamoros2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-16vs TennisAddicts at Tamiami ParkWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Anania / Javier Rodriguez vs Andry Ferrebus / Fernando Blasi6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeonard Chinchay vs Ansarali Atabayev6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesThomas Kunz / Mauricio Marciales vs Michael Palacios / Orlando Santiago7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMartin Marciales / Mauricio Marciales vs Nestor Rincon Soto / Alexis Pino4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Orrego vs Riley Dougherty6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJulio Belandria / Thomas Kunz vs Jose Kreidler / Ricardo Cornejo6-1, 6-4
2025-09-23vs Fascell ForceSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJavier Rodriguez / David Orrego vs Benjamin Bragard / Rodrigo Scheffel6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFelipe de Los Rios vs Oscar Pena3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJames Baker / Thomas Kunz vs Maximilian Grisar / Juan Pablo D'Alessandro6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJulio Belandria vs Miguel Taino0-6, 2-6
2025-09-16vs Sengupta 3.5 winners (Crandon)Won 31
W#1 DoublesThomas Kunz / Julio Belandria vs Leonardo Concha / Juan Diego Tamayo6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeonard Chinchay vs Jaime Sanchez6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Javier Rodriguez vs Mel Tejada / Francisco Cruz1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDavid Orrego vs David Mathai6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14 All Tennis Team at Coral Pine8137823339
2Mejia (Coral Pine)72291638365
3Miami/Buaiz/18&over4.0M62291132316
4Sauce (Alper JCC)63242145403
5Guevara (Doral Park)54232246393
6Fascell Force44231739328
7Shenandoah Tigers at Tropical Park35132757388
8Mixed Nuts at Biltmore36182757426
9Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)26132757394
10Diaz (Coral Reef Park)27182765471
11Malherbe (Royal Palm)27133268459
12Sengupta 3.5 winners (Crandon)08122858411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Ryan Anania
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.05
Mauricio Marciales
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.99
David Orrego
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.95
Leonard Chinchay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Thomas Kunz
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.74
Julio Belandria
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.71
Martin Marciales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Felipe de Los Rios
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Anania + Felipe de Los Rios4159% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Kunz + Julio Belandria404 matchesnot enough data
Felipe de Los Rios + Mauricio Marciales033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ryan Anania
88W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.07
Mauricio Marciales
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
David Orrego
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
Leonard Chinchay
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Thomas Kunz
32W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Julio Belandria
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Martin Marciales
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Felipe de Los Rios
106W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.