Teams

Tonks/Pebble Creek/Fhills

2024 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 40 & over · 4.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-28vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Catherine Lundberg vs Jim Heisler / Sunday Richardson1-6, 2-6
2024-07-21vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesKip Place / Lynne Place vs Aaron Steen / Amanda Berry2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Catherine Lundberg vs Russell Woy / Sunday Richardson0-6, 1-6
2024-07-14vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Catherine Lundberg vs Christopher Blair / Alisa Crooks2-6, 1-6
2024-07-07vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKip Place / Lynne Place vs Daniel Shepler / Sunday Richardson1-6, 3-6
2024-06-23vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Catherine Lundberg vs Daniel Shepler / Helen Woy0-6, 0-6
2024-06-09vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Tonks / Bo Lewis vs Alisa Crooks / Christopher Blair0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
3.81
Tammy Dennis
published
3.77
Karen Tonks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
published
3.52
Lynne Place
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.40
Clay Dennis
published 3.5
3.31
Mark Eckard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Bo Lewis
published 3.5
3.22
Kip Place
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Scott Nestor
published
3.08
Catherine Lundberg
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Place + Kip Place72538% games−4.4% vs expected
Mark Eckard + Karen Tonks4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Everett Wohlbruck
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Tammy Dennis
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Lynne Place
149W–164L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Clay Dennis
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Mark Eckard
49W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Bo Lewis
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kip Place
22W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Scott Nestor
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Catherine Lundberg
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.