Teams

NEGTA/Harriet Connolly

2021 · 22 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 22 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Angela Lindsay
published 4.5
3.95
Allison Hill
published 4
3.94
Nancy Tate
published
3.91
Lisa Wilcox
published
3.90
Ana Laidman
published 4
3.85
Darla Light
published 4
3.70
3.69
Cheryl Russell
published 4
3.69
Kerry Gober
published
3.66
Celia Kramer
published 3.5
3.63
Liz Barwig
published
Elena Cosper
published 3.5
3.24
Harriet Connolly
published 3.5
Kimberly McKenzie
published
Leila Seyler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darla Light + Harriet Connolly3257% games+9.4% vs expected
Harriet Connolly + Allison Hill3351% gamesnot enough data
Harriet Connolly + Winnifred van Den Heever4160% gamesnot enough data
Liz Barwig + Winnifred van Den Heever3259% gamesnot enough data
Liz Barwig + Ana Laidman044 matchesnot enough data
Darla Light + Liz Barwig213 matchesnot enough data
Darla Light + Allison Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Harriet Connolly + Kimberly McKenzie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Lindsay
43W–18L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Allison Hill
50W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
Nancy Tate
84W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
Lisa Wilcox
38W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Ana Laidman
40W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Darla Light
48W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Winnifred van Den Heever
42W–28L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cheryl Russell
67W–28L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Kerry Gober
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Celia Kramer
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.66
Liz Barwig
37W–61L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Elena Cosper
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Harriet Connolly
40W–69L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Kimberly McKenzie
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leila Seyler
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.