Teams

NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: SBRC Devetski

NIN SB Adult 40 & Over · NIN SB 40 & Over 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-07-18vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoug Anderson / William Farabaugh vs Craig Erekson / Jason Hix2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobert Devetski vs David Carey6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Hickman / Devon Papa vs Jeffrey Clements / Matthew Reverman6-3, 7-5
2023-07-11vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSunu Thomas / William Mountford vs James Burkert / Michael Nolan6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMatthew Halfpenny vs Jason Hix4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBradley Sytsma / Devon Papa vs David Carey / Christopher Erekson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Devetski / William Farabaugh vs Jeffrey Clements / Craig Erekson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Chung / Donald Happ vs Kendall Hottell / John McGreevy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-27vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWilliam Mountford / Bradley Sytsma vs James Burkert / Michael Nolan3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Halfpenny vs Elliott Bond6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Farabaugh / Kevin Hickman vs David Carey / Christopher Erekson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDoug Anderson / Devon Papa vs Jeffrey Clements / Craig Erekson6-4, 7-6
2023-06-20vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondWon 31
W#1 DoublesWilliam Farabaugh / William Mountford vs Elliott Bond / Michael Nolan6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Halfpenny vs James Burkert6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKevin Hickman / Devon Papa vs Jeffrey Clements / Craig Erekson7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Anderson / Robert Devetski vs David Carey / Christopher Erekson4-6, 3-6
2023-06-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald Happ / Philip Egilmez vs Steve Bibi / Kendall Hottell2-6, 5-7
2023-06-13vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondWon 31
L#1 DoublesWilliam Mountford / Sunu Thomas vs Elliott Bond / James Burkert6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Halfpenny vs Jason Hix6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDevon Papa / Donald Happ vs Craig Erekson / Christopher Erekson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDoug Anderson / Kevin Hickman vs Jeffrey Clements / Matthew Reverman7-5, 6-4
2023-06-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald Happ / Philip Egilmez vs Tim Lawmaster / David Pugh6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-06vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mountford / Bradley Sytsma vs Matthew Reverman / Jeffrey Clements6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWilliam Farabaugh vs David Carey6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDoug Anderson / Robert Devetski vs Elliott Bond / Craig Erekson6-3, 6-3
2023-05-30vs NIN SB 40&O 4.5 M: EL BondLost 03
L#1 DoublesDoug Anderson / Bradley Sytsma vs James Burkert / Michael Nolan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Hickman / Devon Papa vs Jeffrey Clements / Matthew Reverman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Devetski / Donald Happ vs David Carey / Christopher Erekson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NIN SB 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
William Mountford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Bradley Sytsma
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Devon Papa
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.06
William Farabaugh
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.01
Kevin Hickman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.99
Robert Devetski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Donald Happ
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Matthew Halfpenny
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sunu Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Mountford + Bradley Sytsma11164% games+11.9% vs expected
William Mountford + William Farabaugh404 matchesnot enough data
William Farabaugh + Kevin Hickman134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Devetski + William Farabaugh123 matchesnot enough data
Devon Papa + Kevin Hickman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Mountford
50W–8L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Bradley Sytsma
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Devon Papa
34W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.11
William Farabaugh
20W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
Kevin Hickman
15W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
Robert Devetski
44W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.99
Donald Happ
27W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Halfpenny
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sunu Thomas
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.