Teams

*5-JZavaglia-CHCC

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-01vs *1-KTravis-Eno-WWLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoli Stockwell / Lisa Munster vs Krissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer3-6, 3-6
2024-04-17vs *3-LWollman-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Munster / Justine Zavaglia vs Lynn Furgurson / Julie Vozella6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-15vs *1-KTravis-Eno-WWLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Munster / Elizabeth Richards vs Maria Sanchez / Jacqueline Yurkovich3-6, 4-6
2024-04-10vs *4-EEverett-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Munster / Elizabeth Richards vs Kelly Moore / Hadley Nixon1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarci Hansen / Lucy Leach vs Elizabeth Albright / Susan Peak4-6, 3-6
2024-03-25vs *4-EEverett-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoli Stockwell / Lisa Munster vs Kate Barron / Susan Peak6-4, 6-3
2024-03-13vs *3-LWollman-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Munster / Cherreka Kiel vs Julie Vozella / Stacey Lange2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Schreiber / Marci Hansen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Joli Stockwell
published
3.16
Lisa Munster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Marci Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
2.84
Cherreka Kiel
published 3
2.76
Justine Zavaglia
published
2.60
2.37
Maggie Hanes
published
2.30
Carrie Schreiber
published 2.5
Anita Cook
published 2.5
Gillian Mishalko
published 2.5
Barbara van Leeuwen
published
Lucy Leach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherreka Kiel + Carrie Schreiber1534% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Yarbrough + Marci Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Marci Hansen + Joli Stockwell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joli Stockwell
52W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Lisa Munster
32W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.16
3
Marci Hansen
51W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Elizabeth Richards
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Cherreka Kiel
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
Justine Zavaglia
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Courtney Yarbrough
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.60
Maggie Hanes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Carrie Schreiber
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Anita Cook
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Gillian Mishalko
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Barbara van Leeuwen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucy Leach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.