Teams

Highgrove - McEldoon

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Brooke Moore
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.50
Stacee Mceldoon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Lindsay Hepler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Deborah Baus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Pamela Saylor
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Kristin Hancock
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Victoria Wyatt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Dana Lezaj
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Gladys Walker
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Jennifer Vannier
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Denise Hofrichter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Cathy Chordegian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Amie Craddock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Carol Corrigan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Mattie Smith
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Buffie Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Buffie Davenport + Gladys Walker8551% games+2.8% vs expected
Mattie Smith + Victoria Wyatt101345% games−2.8% vs expected
Mattie Smith + Buffie Davenport134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Hancock + Amie Craddock044 matchesnot enough data
Mattie Smith + Lindsay Hepler123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Corrigan + Denise Hofrichter033 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hepler + Amie Craddock213 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hepler + Deborah Baus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Moore
36W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
Stacee Mceldoon
25W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Lindsay Hepler
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Deborah Baus
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Pamela Saylor
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kristin Hancock
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Victoria Wyatt
25W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Dana Lezaj
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Gladys Walker
14W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jennifer Vannier
14W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Denise Hofrichter
22W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Cathy Chordegian
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Amie Craddock
18W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Carol Corrigan
17W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Mattie Smith
25W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Buffie Davenport
14W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.