← Teams

SAC-Marsh

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Kristin Spear
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Kristie Leake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.82
Teresa Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Julie Legassick
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Michael Leake
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Robin Fernstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Matt Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Jeff Legassick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Tim Fernstrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Todd Spear
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-03-12Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMichael Leake / Robin Fernstrom vs Holly Kanz / Jeff Marshall6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Legassick / Tim Fernstrom vs KEELEY PLOMBON / Shiloh Halsey6-1, 6-2
2022-03-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTeresa Sullivan / Todd Spear vs Michael Lavios / Frederique Lavios6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Michael Leake vs Michael Rich / Marianne Conroy6-2, 6-3
2022-03-05Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesMary Marsh / Michael Leake vs Gabriela McIntosh / Keith Main6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Todd Spear vs Emily Vander Ploeg / Scott Reis6-2, 6-3
2022-02-25Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTodd Spear / Kristin Spear vs Eunhee Heller / Gregg Palmer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Marsh / Michael Leake vs Jason Dortch / Toni Eastwood7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Legassick / Julie Legassick vs Wendy Nakatani / Jeff Lipke6-3, 6-1
2022-02-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesTim Fernstrom / Megan Meagher vs Jeff Anhaltzer / Kristin Bialobok5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Todd Spear vs Nancy Osborne / Stephen Osborne6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Legassick / Michael Sullivan vs Richard Anderson / Jayne Mitchell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTodd Spear / Kristie Leake vs Mark Meyer / Sarah Robertson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Sullivan / Kristin Spear vs Sara Crate / Walt Crate6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Marsh / Robin Fernstrom vs Michael Delanty / Susan Sienko6-2, 6-0
2022-02-05Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMichael Leake / Julie Legassick vs Jackie Konen / Robert Truong7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-30Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTeresa Sullivan / Tim Fernstrom vs Assen Dinkov / Annie Tran6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Matt Curtis vs Cheryl Geisler / Charles Hahn6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Legassick / Julie Legassick vs Andrea Kropp / Josh Belzman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kristin Spear
110W–39L career
3%97%0%
4.12
4.5
Kristie Leake
126W–83L career · type A
26%74%0%
3.95
4
Teresa Sullivan
112W–57L career
0%98%1%
3.82
3.5
Julie Legassick
32W–33L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Leake
16W–40L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Robin Fernstrom
48W–36L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Matt Curtis
45W–35L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Jeff Legassick
31W–47L career
not enough data
—
3
Tim Fernstrom
20W–31L career
not enough data
—
0
Todd Spear
23W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.