Teams

FD 8.0 KI Kim

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 8.0 Fusion Doubles

20 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NEOTA 18&O 8.0 Fusion Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Thompson
published 4.5
4.04
Akin Fashina
published 4
4.02
Adam Atwell
published 4.5
3.84
Komila Mirolimova
published
3.78
Motoo Saito
published
3.77
Neal Repko
published
3.77
Hannah Ruddock
published
3.69
Morgan Mills
published
3.53
Kelsey Ruddock
published
3.51
Erica Wigton
published
3.40
Jinu Hwang
published
3.35
Edward Converse
published
3.32
Libby Freeman
published
3.20
VIctoria Ung
published
3.19
Hyundong Cho
published
Elyse Lightner
published
Jessica Naik
published
Marybeth Esposito
published
Nathan Palinkas
published
Renee de Windt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Lightner + Hannah Ruddock7072% games+17.0% vs expected
Adam Atwell + Akin Fashina7266% games+12.9% vs expected
Jinu Hwang + Motoo Saito3255% gamesnot enough data
Elyse Lightner + Kelsey Ruddock314 matchesnot enough data
Erica Wigton + Elyse Lightner303 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Ruddock + Kelsey Ruddock303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Thompson
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Akin Fashina
104W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Adam Atwell
78W–49L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
Komila Mirolimova
53W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.84
Motoo Saito
38W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Neal Repko
45W–36L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Hannah Ruddock
39W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Morgan Mills
71W–29L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Kelsey Ruddock
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Erica Wigton
43W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Jinu Hwang
81W–66L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Edward Converse
35W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Libby Freeman
38W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
VIctoria Ung
159W–66L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.20
Hyundong Cho
47W–32L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Elyse Lightner
30W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Naik
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marybeth Esposito
114W–74L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathan Palinkas
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee de Windt
31W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.