Teams

Different Strokes

2021 Prince George's Tri-level · Tri-level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-13vs Net GirlzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarthy Boston / Cynthia Clinton Brown vs Jothi Nedungadi / Telores Hill6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Marshall / Sherri Colston vs Denise Milligan / Tinya Coles-Cieply4-6, 3-6
2021-11-12vs Net GirlzLost 01
L#3 DoublesWanda Fells / Sherri Colston vs Casey Royster / REGINA DAVIS5-7, 6-7
2021-11-06vs Net GirlzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Carthy Boston vs Telores Hill / Jothi Nedungadi6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Reid / Sherri Colston vs Denise Milligan / Catherine Wynne4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-10-31vs Net GirlzLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherri Colston / Vene Lagon vs REGINA DAVIS / Catherine Wynne1-6, 0-6
2021-10-30vs Net GirlzLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherri Colston / Stephanie Marshall vs Casey Royster / Tinya Coles-Cieply6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-24vs Net GirlzLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnette Harrington / Cynthia Clinton Brown vs Claris Brock / Andrea Motley2-6, 5-7
2021-10-23vs Net GirlzLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Melea King vs Jothi Nedungadi / Telores Hill4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
PAULA SMITH
published
3.60
Arial Pegues
published 4
3.27
Cynthia Clinton Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carrie Anderson
published 3.5
Carthy Boston
published 3.5
2.68
Venita Cooper
published
2.62
Sherri Colston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Stephanie Marshall
published
2.50
Wanda Fells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Annette Harrington
published
Karolyn Clarke
published
Vene Lagon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wanda Fells + Sherri Colston5647% gamesnot enough data
Venita Cooper + Sherri Colston134 matchesnot enough data
Venita Cooper + Stephanie Marshall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PAULA SMITH
48W–32L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Arial Pegues
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cynthia Clinton Brown
118W–76L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carrie Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Carthy Boston
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Venita Cooper
20W–23L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Sherri Colston
57W–83L career · 5 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.62
Stephanie Marshall
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Wanda Fells
22W–35L career · 1 line in 2021
51%49%<1%
2.50
Annette Harrington
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karolyn Clarke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vene Lagon
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.