Teams

KRA Walek

2022 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Mary-Lynn Ferrante6-4, 6-2
2022-08-11vs ACAC WeddleLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Dina Weddle0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Robin Griffith4-6, 6-7
2022-08-04vs CCV CampbellLost 01
L#2 SinglesKatherine Fleck vs Amanda Galanti3-6, 1-6
2022-08-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Jane Doe6-1, 6-1
2022-07-20vs MAC ScottLost 02
L#1 SinglesSara Winterhoff vs Kaitlyn Mejia0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBobbie Lou Oley vs Deirdre Vaughan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-14vs WOCC GregoryWon 10
W#2 SinglesBobbie Lou Oley vs Morgan Hutter6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Whitney Sandridge
published
3.68
Bobbie Lou Oley
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.48
Krista Quinby
published
3.48
Lauren Turner
published
3.45
Carlyle Walek
published 3.5
3.33
Katherine Fleck
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.24
Sara Winterhoff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.06
Jenny Sharrar
published
2.95
Bridgit Kreutzer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Fleck + Sara Winterhoff141645% games−2.9% vs expected
Sara Winterhoff + Krista Quinby123 matchesnot enough data
Carlyle Walek + Bobbie Lou Oley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Sandridge
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Bobbie Lou Oley
139W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Krista Quinby
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lauren Turner
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Carlyle Walek
129W–89L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Katherine Fleck
65W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Sara Winterhoff
99W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Jenny Sharrar
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Bridgit Kreutzer
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.