Teams

Liu18_3.5/META

2026 Mixed 18 & over-META · 3.5 Mixed Doubles

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs Bunch/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesDoug Levin / Jean Swindle vs Elizabeth Johnson / Chris Blackstone6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Micklewright / Mary Warner vs Ju Mo / Lifei Wang5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKe Liu / Makie Kordamiri vs Jane Dean / Damon Dean6-3, 6-1
2026-07-20vs Hinkle/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesKe Liu / Makie Kordamiri vs Gareth Rowlands / Sydney Davis2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSeth Whitley / Christina Betancourt vs Lance Taylor / Eve Little Bradford0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Micklewright / Mary Warner vs Ricky Frye / Shannon Hinkle4-6, 3-6
2026-06-27vs Bunch/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesDoug Levin / Jean Swindle vs John Paul Abner / Lynne Little7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDirk DiSantis / Lenoire Lawing vs Damon Dean / Brittini Thacker7-6, 5-5
L#3 DoublesSeth Whitley / Christina Betancourt vs John Graham / Jane Dean1-6, 1-6
2026-06-20vs Hinkle/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesDoug Levin / Mary Warner vs Ricky Frye / Shannon Hinkle0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Micklewright / Makie Kordamiri vs Daniel Bogachek / Mary Beth Shults-kumar6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDirk DiSantis / Christina Betancourt vs Lance Taylor / Eve Little Bradford0-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Bunch/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesDoug Levin / Mary Warner vs Austin Herron / Elizabeth Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Micklewright / Lenoire Lawing vs Lifei Wang / Ju Mo5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJean Swindle / Seth Whitley vs Damon Dean / Jane Dean6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Ke Liu vs Gareth Rowlands / Sydney Davis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liu18_3.5/META1551328199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Doug Levin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.41
Robert Micklewright
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Dirk DiSantis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Christina Betancourt
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.92
Makie Kordamiri
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Jean Swindle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Doug Levin
14W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.81
Robert Micklewright
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Dirk DiSantis
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Christina Betancourt
5W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Makie Kordamiri
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jean Swindle
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.