Teams

WI 3.5 M Metro Bowers non-progressing

2024 WI Metro Fall · 3.5 Metro M non-progressing

4 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-23vs Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Tweet / James Morrell vs Paul Lubinski / Cassidy McGarry3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Bowers vs Brady Cassada6-2, 7-6
2024-10-16vs Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Bowers / James Morrell vs Brady Cassada / Cassidy McGarry7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNate Schoenborn vs Paul Lubinski3-6, 2-6
2024-10-09vs Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Morrell / Todd Tweet vs Brady Cassada / Paul Lubinski2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Bowers vs Cassidy McGarry6-3, 6-1
2024-10-02vs Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressingWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Bowers / James Morrell vs Cassidy McGarry / Paul Lubinski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTodd Tweet vs Brady Cassada7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-25vs Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNate Schoenborn / Todd Tweet vs Brady Cassada / Cassidy McGarry4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Bowers vs Paul Lubinski6-3, 6-2
2024-09-18vs Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Bowers / Todd Tweet vs Paul Lubinski / Brady Cassada6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNate Schoenborn vs Cassidy McGarry1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Metro M non-progressing
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI 3.5 M Metro Bowers non-progressing0671124186
2Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressing0651326174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Nate Schoenborn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
James Morrell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Ryan Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Todd Tweet
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nate Schoenborn
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
James Morrell
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Bowers
45W–46L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Tweet
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.