Teams

Battlefield Ballbusters-Ford

2025 Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over · Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-09vs YMCA No Drama Mamas-JobrackWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudi Shoemaker / Jamie Stokes vs Amy French / Judith Jobrack7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Karla Kopec vs Teresa Wallendjack / Lea Morrissey6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-23vs YMCA No Drama Mamas-JobrackLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Karla Kopec vs Amy French / Jill Huntington3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-15vs YMCA No Drama Mamas-JobrackLost 02
L#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Mary Jane Wooldridge vs Kim Gudyka / Tracey Nankivel3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTara Ford / Sue Nilsson vs Lea Morrissey / Judith Jobrack3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-09vs YMCA No Drama Mamas-JobrackWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Palmer / Judi Shoemaker vs Maggie Britvec / Sumiyo McShea6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-02vs YMCA No Drama Mamas-JobrackLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Alice Meyers-Paulin vs Tracey Nankivel / Amy French7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudi Shoemaker / Lisa Palmer vs Leslie Caliri / Teresa Wallendjack6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTara Ford / Sue Nilsson vs Judith Jobrack / Kim Gudyka0-6, 3-6
2025-01-12vs YMCA No Drama Mamas-JobrackLost 01
L#3 DoublesMerry Foresta / Sue Nilsson vs Jill Huntington / Bobbi Shoop0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Jamie Stokes
published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Jacalyn Bennett
published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Palmer
published
2.94
Karla Kopec
published
2.89
Judi Shoemaker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Tara Ford
published
2.81
Sue Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
June Brick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judi Shoemaker + Debbie Kem224 matchesnot enough data
Jacalyn Bennett + Debbie Kem123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jacalyn Bennett
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lisa Palmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
Karla Kopec
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Judi Shoemaker
112W–135L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
June Brick
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jane Wooldridge
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.