Teams

Seminole Lake Hutton

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.0 M Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs Pinellas - McMullen/MillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Tony Henrion vs Christopher Walsh / Ray Pasinski0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRandall Meisner vs Josh Melton6-3, 6-3
2022-06-11vs Pinellas - McMullen/MillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Mars / Randall Meisner vs Erik Breitenbach / Ray Pasinski0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Tony Henrion vs Josh Melton / Jaime Villegas6-2, 6-3
2022-06-04vs Pinellas - McMullen/MillerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMauricio Caccia / Jonathan Mellen vs Josh Melton / Albert Alhadeff6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Mars / Randall Meisner vs Erik Breitenbach / Daren McGovern1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-28vs Pinellas - McMullen/MillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Mars / Randall Meisner vs Josh Melton / Steven Ehrenpreis0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJonathan Mellen / John Hockin vs Dane Houston / Albert Alhadeff7-5, 6-3
2022-05-21vs Pinellas - McMullen/MillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathan Mellen / John Hockin vs Ray Pasinski / Christopher Walsh4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRandall Meisner vs Michael Rossi4-6, 1-6
2022-05-07vs Pinellas - McMullen/MillerLost 02
L#1 SinglesRandall Meisner vs Michael Rossi1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Michael Fernandez vs Josh Melton / Dane Houston3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
David Palmer
published 4
3.89
Brian Hodapp
published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.43
Gary Hutton
published 4
Jonathan Mellen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Randall Meisner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Palmer + Brian Hodapp7162% games+1.6% vs expected
John Hockin + Gary Hutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Palmer
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Gary Hutton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.43
Jonathan Mellen
63W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randall Meisner
39W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.