Teams

Clayton, Cheryl

2026 Combo 55 & Over-JXN · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Jones, LibbyLost 12
L#1 DoublesWanza Anderson / Jane Turner vs Libby Jones / Deborah Norman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Clayton / Teresa Dottley vs Cathy Ainsworth / Stephanie Sing3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Guizerix / Nina Tomlinson vs Nikki Elam / Kristin Steen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-16vs Moseley, SallieWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Guizerix / Nina Tomlinson vs Robin Harkey / Abba Mapp6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJordan Goodwin / Phyllis Keveryn vs Leslie Ashford / Sandy Temple6-3, 6-2
2026-08-09vs Baine, PshanLost 12
L#1 DoublesNina Tomlinson / Christine Guizerix vs Mary Ruth Caldwell / Mary Taylor6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Howard / Teresa Dottley vs Venecca Green / Mary Beth Cantrell6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Rushton / Eva Hunter vs Deborah McGehee / Miao Zhao3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Wanza Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Barbara Rushton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Christine Guizerix
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Cheryl Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Kelly Howard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Teresa Dottley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Nina Tomlinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Jordan Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Phyllis Keveryn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Elizabeth Crisler
published
3.09
Eva Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Dallas
published
Sheila Haynes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wanza Anderson + Cheryl Clayton5258% games+2.9% vs expected
Christine Guizerix + Nina Tomlinson1547% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Haynes + Teresa Dottley303 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Dottley + Elizabeth Crisler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wanza Anderson
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Barbara Rushton
14W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.66
4
Christine Guizerix
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Cheryl Clayton
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kelly Howard
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.56
Teresa Dottley
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Nina Tomlinson
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.27
Jordan Goodwin
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Phyllis Keveryn
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Elizabeth Crisler
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
Eva Hunter
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Lisa Dallas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheila Haynes
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.