Teams

VTC-Agee

Adult Summer Social League · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Kaytlynn Kolb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Carrie Willis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Nikki Nadig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Jenny Pizot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results4 ties
2020-08-22Split 11
W#1 SinglesKaytlynn Kolb vs Tess Stem4-3, 4-2
L#2 DoublesJenny Pizot / Nikki Nadig vs Heather Watkins / Cindy Rushall4-3, 4-3
2020-08-15Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNikki Nadig / Pamela Meiling vs Karen Dellinger / Traci Harris4-2, 4-1
L#1 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Kelly Mohr4-2, 4-1
2020-08-09Split 11
L#1 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Karen Dellinger1-4, 4-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenny Pizot / Susan Agee vs Rie Sasakawa / Shamarra Jackson4-2, 4-0
2020-07-19Split 11
L#1 SinglesKaytlynn Kolb vs Tess Stem4-2, 4-0
W#2 DoublesJenny Pizot / Nikki Nadig vs Heather Watkins / Susan Ford3-4, 4-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kaytlynn Kolb
70W–38L career
31%69%0%
3.93
4
Carrie Willis
121W–52L career
0%97%3%
3.85
4
Nikki Nadig
71W–60L career
12%88%0%
3.62
3.5
Jenny Pizot
44W–56L career
4%95%0%
3.19

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.