Teams

CTL40/LIVINGSTON/CTFC

CTL Fall 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult Women - 3.0 Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-10vs CTL40/TYSON/GVWon 30
W#2 DoublesDiana Joyner / Megan McCollum vs Theresa Moore / Doris Mosley6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLindsey Livingston / Kristin Plyler vs Sarah Lewis / Reka Corley6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesLeigh Cason / Stacy Strong vs Mya Wilson / Monica Tyson6-1, 6-0
2025-11-06vs CTL40/CONROY/WWDWon 20
W#2 DoublesStacy Strong / Susan Porter vs Laura Hess / Helen Conroy6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesLindsey Livingston / Kristin Plyler vs Katie McDougall / Deborah Conroy6-3, 7-5
2025-10-14Won 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Moses / Stacy Strong vs Anna Baysden / Carleen Smoak6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Joyner / Katie Atkinson vs Annie Hightower / Lori Murray4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindsey Livingston / Kristin Plyler vs Betsy Goodale / Marie Aimone6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-07vs CTL40/KNUDSEN/RKWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Strong / Leigh Cason vs Caroline Connare / Rebecca Walker6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Porter / Laurin Gandy vs Natalie O'Bradovich / Ann Marie Mims6-2, 6-4
L#4 DoublesJennie Bradley / Leslie McKenzie vs LynAnne Knudsen / Patricia Earle6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult Women - 3.0 Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Diana Joyner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.16
Shaun Rooney
published
3.08
Stacy Strong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
3.01
Lindsey Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Laurin Gandy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Leslie McKenzie
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Sarah Hood
published
Rebecca Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Joyner + Lindsey Livingston7176% games+21.6% vs expected
Stacy Strong + Shaun Rooney314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Jeffords + Shaun Rooney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Joyner
102W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
Shaun Rooney
43W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
Stacy Strong
86W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Elizabeth Jeffords
71W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Lindsey Livingston
70W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Laurin Gandy
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Leslie McKenzie
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%18%82%
2.62
Sarah Hood
38W–36L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Rebecca Walker
22W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.