Teams

LWR Nicholson

2026 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

19 players · average NTRP 4.05 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-21vs The LWR PlayersWon 30
W#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Christine Handel vs Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom / Lu Circelli6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Heidi Cox vs Christine Tosti / Betty Jo Zeigler6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Elizabeth Goelz vs Geneil Roberts / Sheila Sosa6-0, 6-0
2026-03-14vs TPC Windsor 40 4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Handel / Diana Stadelnikas vs Roberta Smith / Michelle McGrath6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNia Esposito vs Debbie Crowley1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarcia Frost / Heidi Cox vs Polina Windsor / SallyAnn Mastropietro6-3, 6-0
2026-02-28vs River Strand Net ProphetsWon 31
W#1 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Kara Beene / Kim Reiser6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBarbara Cogen vs Jodie Wang4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Goelz / Gina Hagopian vs Nancy Finman / Annmarie Curle6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Karen Spiegel vs Bernadette King / Judi Wilson6-4, 6-2
2026-02-21vs Wild Blue 40 LoveSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Svetlana Janglin / Linda Radovich4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarcia Frost vs Hong Li1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Handel / Elizabeth Goelz vs Nancy Moran / Donna Dubinsky6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarbara Cogen / Heidi Cox vs Jennifer Butcher / Nanelle Rosales1-6, 2-6
2026-02-14vs SARASOTA/CarrettaLost 04
L#1 DoublesGina Hagopian / Natalie Bloch vs Cindy Rosenberg / Nina Mortazavi3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Goelz vs Courtney Rosenthal4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Spiegel / Diana Stadelnikas vs Carrie Carretta / Dana Slackman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Nicholson / Victoria Reid vs Beth Robinson / Sarah Anne Mcdonald4-6, 0-6
2026-02-11vs River Strand Net ProphetsWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Handel / Megan McAloon vs Bernadette King / Judi Wilson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarol Frazier vs Kristen Keyser6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Perry / Diana Stadelnikas vs Annmarie Curle / Kim Reiser3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman6-2, 6-3
2026-02-07vs TPC Windsor 40 4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesNatalie Bloch / Nia Esposito vs Roberta Smith / Marsha Timm6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristine Handel vs Sally Joyce6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Gina Hagopian vs Suzy Feinberg / Keely Crosby7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesVictoria Reid / Karen Spiegel vs Kathy Sawyer / Polina Windsor7-5, 6-4
2026-01-24vs The LWR PlayersWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Handel / Diana Stadelnikas vs Christine Tosti / Karen Patchell6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristie Uihlein vs Kerri Helms6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Reid / Barbara Cogen vs Hillary Nielsen / Sheila Sosa6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarcia Frost / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Geneil Roberts / Laura Severson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-17vs Wild Blue 40 LoveLost 13
W#1 DoublesKaren Nicholson / Carol Frazier vs Jennifer Butcher / Martina Kralickova7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristie Uihlein vs Hong Li0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Larkin / Natalie Bloch vs Sue Silberbusch / Nicole Thompson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Collins / Elizabeth Goelz vs Kathy Rain / Donna Dubinsky6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-10vs SARASOTA/CarrettaLost 13
L#1 DoublesHeidi Cox / Megan McAloon vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Dana Slackman4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarol Frazier vs Cristina Tomadin6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Karen Spiegel vs Yudi Carpenter / Beth Robinson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Perry / Lauren Larkin vs Melissa Caldwell / Lisa Temple2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Christine Handel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.98
Megan McAloon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Nia Esposito
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.86
Natalie Bloch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.83
Gina Hagopian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Lauren Feingold Navas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Heidi Cox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Lauren Larkin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Christie Uihlein
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Goelz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Karen Spiegel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Karen Nicholson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Sheila Perry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Karen Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Victoria Reid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Barbara Cogen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.42
Marcia Frost
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nia Esposito + Natalie Bloch8457% games+9.1% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Nia Esposito18955% games+5.4% vs expected
Gina Hagopian + Megan McAloon9157% games+5.4% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Christine Handel6163% games+4.5% vs expected
Nia Esposito + Megan McAloon5257% games+4.0% vs expected
Gina Hagopian + Lauren Feingold Navas6162% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Feingold Navas + Megan McAloon5066% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Cox + Natalie Bloch314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.51
4
Christine Handel
26W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Megan McAloon
137W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Nia Esposito
154W–82L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Natalie Bloch
57W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Gina Hagopian
70W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Heidi Cox
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Lauren Larkin
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Christie Uihlein
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Goelz
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Karen Collins
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Victoria Reid
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Barbara Cogen
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Marcia Frost
22W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.