Teams

10 James River Surge

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Andrew Bolyard vs Jeffrey Lloyd / Eric Gordon7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Andrew Lengua vs Samuel Coburn / George Bishop6-1, 6-4
2022-07-03vs 9 ACAC WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Deeb / Andrew Bolyard vs Jeffrey Foddrell / Jeffrey Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-06-28vs 8 Willow Oaks BlackwoodWon 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Bardaro / David Aschheim vs John Port / Keyur Shah4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-26vs 7 Burkwood ClarkSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Andrew Bolyard vs Samuel Poole / Andrew Barth6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCharles Sipe / Walter Norwood vs Wayne Clark / Jonathan Kovarcik4-6, 4-6
2022-06-23vs 5 Avalon LuchsingerWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Lengua / Walter Norwood vs Darrell Jervey / Gregory Blouch6-2, 7-5
2022-06-21vs 3 CCV Murphy ParkerWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Ryan Bardaro vs Hunt Chipley / Todd Baird6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.42
Marc Elim
published
3.35
Andrew Bolyard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Ryan Bardaro
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
David Aschheim
published 3.5
3.29
Andrew Lengua
published 3.5
3.23
Waiman Law
published
3.15
Tracy Marks
published
3.03
Walter Norwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Brian Premock
published 3.5
Tom Rider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Bardaro + Andrew Bolyard4349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Elim
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Andrew Bolyard
126W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ryan Bardaro
177W–150L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
David Aschheim
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Lengua
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Waiman Law
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Walter Norwood
100W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Brian Premock
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.