Teams

CTL40/HUNTER/RK

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - USTA · 40 & Over Mixed 6.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.05 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Shannon Peterson
published
3.20
Ellen Rodillo
published 3.5
3.03
Keith Axson
published
2.97
Caroline Connare
published 3
2.79
Annie Hightower
published 3
2.73
Chuck Henderson
published 3
2.73
Scott Lambe
published
2.67
Carleen Smoak
published 3
2.66
Ann Marie Mims
published 3
2.64
Allen Smoak
published 3
2.62
Carol Heebner
published 3
2.61
Patricia Earle
published
2.59
Thad Cleary
published
2.52
Donnie Mims
published 3
2.50
Becky Hunter
published 3
Alan Lott
published
Lori Murray
published
Wade Sellers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carleen Smoak + Allen Smoak1538% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Earle + Scott Lambe224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Peterson
146W–28L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Ellen Rodillo
93W–70L career · type A · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Keith Axson
95W–54L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Caroline Connare
138W–122L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Annie Hightower
52W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Chuck Henderson
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Scott Lambe
32W–59L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carleen Smoak
69W–60L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Ann Marie Mims
55W–84L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Allen Smoak
7W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Carol Heebner
55W–72L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
Patricia Earle
65W–119L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Thad Cleary
38W–32L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Donnie Mims
10W–25L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Becky Hunter
55W–60L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Alan Lott
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Murray
40W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wade Sellers
32W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.